The DWP and police’s latest move against disabled protesters is totally ‘vindictive’

Police standing behind disability activists
Fréa Lockley

A freedom of information (FOI) request has revealed a shocking truth. A police force has admitted to sharing information about “disabled people and other activists” with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

“Spying on disabled protesters”

As Disability News Service (DNS) reported, following an FOI request, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) “admitted” that:

it has a written agreement to share information about disabled people and other activists who take part in protests with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

Despite previous denials, this confirmed suspicions about “links between DWP and police forces… and the impact on disabled people’s right to protest”. In December, DNS reported that forces seemed to deliberately target peaceful, disabled anti-fracking protesters. Reportedly, this seemed to be an attempt to remove protesters’ disability benefits.

Following this new evidence:

Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People (GMCDP) said it was “extremely concerned” that its local police force was “spying on disabled protesters and passing on their details onto the DWP”.

“Vindictive”

Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) coordinator Kevin Blowe told The Canary:

The police decision to collaborate with the DWP is about disrupting people’s ability to take part in protest and campaigns. It’s a perfect example of this type of disruption. It’s bad enough that the DWP already humiliates people who claim benefits. But if it’s going to go out of its way to find ways to stop people’s benefits – if they exercise what is supposed to be a fundamental human right – then I can see why people would be reluctant to potentially participate in something that may have a really terrible effect on their life.

Blowe continued:

This is a really worrying development, that I think is entirely vindictive. The suggestion that anyone who… takes part in protest if they’re disabled is likely to be committing fraud – which is what’s implied by the police getting involved in this – is about trying to make sure that the effectiveness of protest is undermined.

Condemnation of this news came swiftly, including from the Green Party’s Jenny Jones:

The right to protest

In December, Lancashire police admitted to sharing “both information and video footage of disabled anti-fracking protesters” with the DWP.

GMP also admitted passing information about protesters to the DWP from anti-fracking protests in 2013 and 2014. DNS said this raised further concerns about the treatment of disabled people protesting against “austerity-related social security reforms”.

DNS also reported a lack of clarity over how formal this arrangement between GMP and the DWP might be:

GMP’s press office had initially suggested that it did have an agreement with DWP, before later denying there was one.

Following a second FOI from DNS, GNP “confirmed” this agreement. But it then failed to respond to emails until 24 July when GMP responded. It said it would “risk assess the agreement”. Yet DNS also said:

The force’s press office refused to comment… or to explain why it had previously claimed there was no such agreement.

GMCDP digital campaigns officer, Brian Hilton asked:

Are we now saying if you can protest you should not be in receipt of benefits? Should disabled people stay locked inside their homes in case they are sanctioned?

Again, the shifting version of events between GMP and the DWP provoked anger:

Extremists?

As Blowe explained, this news is linked to wider trends in police surveillance and legitimate protest:

Surveillance is about ways to label people as extremists and then disrupt their ability to be effective as campaigners. This is about finding ways to make sure you identify people who may well be seen as ‘a problem’ or as vulnerable and then ensuring that they are targeted. And that’s the reason why, unfortunately, disabled people have been targeted before.

He continued:

We’ve seen that with targeting disabled people at fracking protests in Lancashire, with often very violent policing. This is about trying to discourage people. But also, because people often get really angry when they see somebody tipped out of their wheelchair. Often people want to react to that. So it’s a way of then being able to make other arrests as well.

As Dennis Queen, from Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) said, the agreement “sounds like a breach of our rights to engage in political protest”.

Awareness of these communications between police and the DWP came alongside news about shifting policing powers in the UK. Boris Johnson indicated that the term ‘extremist’ might also soon extend to anti-fox hunting activists.

“Chilling”

Queen said that the agreement between police and the DWP would have:

a directly chilling effect on people’s ability to stick up for their rights and join in campaigns, both relating to disability and not.

In 2017, the UN described the situation in the UK as a “human catastrophe” due to “grave” and “systematic” violations of disabled people’s human rights under successive Conservative governments. So if the DWP and police now want to hinder their efforts to protest, it’s nothing short of disgusting.

Featured image via Twitter – Charlotte Hughes

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t the police and government not only trampling all over their human rights, but also the UK’s disability laws? I’d be happy to contribute to a crowd funded campaign to take this to court.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.