An analysis of opinion polls shows British people have turned against Brexit since the 2016 referendum. Since the vote to Leave, the UK government, supported by the DUP, has failed to come up with a viable plan to leave the EU. Yet the UK’s corporate media is now trying to blame the Irish for this, rather than focusing on this mood change that has been taking place in the UK since 2017.
Opinion poll analysis
As the Evening Standard reported, research data and analytics group YouGov analysed 226 Brexit opinion polls since July 2017. 204 of those polls show the majority of British people now favour Remain.
Since late 2017, the number of polls showing a lead for Leave has fallen. In fact, in 2019 just one poll showed a lead for Leave.
This must come as a real slap in the face for Johnson’s adviser Dominic Cummings who has attempted to portray the Brexit debate as a ‘people V parliament’ debate. Cummings claimed MPs weren’t in touch with what people in the “real world” think. These polls clearly show British people have changed their minds since the 2016 referendum.
Analysts believe one key reason for the shift in opinion is caused by voters in Labour areas changing their minds. Additionally, younger people who support remaining in the EU can now vote, and elderly people who voted in large numbers in 2016 have passed away.
Blaming the Irish is avoidance
But rather than focusing on these poll results and the disaster that a no-deal Brexit could bring to the UK, the corporate media focuses on the Irish government. Ireland, of course, owes the UK nothing. In fact, it’s quite the opposite.
Yet as Fair reported on 11 October, the Conservatives and the establishment media seem intent on ‘blaming’ the Irish Taoiseach, or prime minister, Leo Varadkar for the ongoing Brexit impasse. As it noted:
Varadkar, whose country would have to deal with an entirely new border situation in the case of a no-deal Brexit, has a vested interest in pushing the UK and the EU toward some kind of an agreement. And the papers just aren’t having it.
Disaster the Brexit could create
For some time, the impact of a no-deal Brexit has been clear.
For example, retailers warned of food shortages if the UK were to leave the EU without a deal with the EU. This was confirmed to be a distinct possibility when details were released in the Government’s contingency document ‘Operation Yellowhammer’. The document stated there will be a reduction in the choice and availability of certain food and an increase in price “which could impact vulnerable groups”.
On 10 October, Professor Dame Sally Davies, England’s chief medical officer, highlighted a much starker warning. Davies claimed a no-deal Brexit could lead to deaths. She said:
We cannot guarantee that there will not be shortages, not only of medicines but technology and gadgets and things and there may be deaths, we cannot guarantee that there won’t.
What Brexiteers promised during the referendum
One of the many claims made by the Vote Leave campaign was that leaving the EU would result in £350m per week being directed towards the NHS. Vote Leave displayed this message on the side of the Brexit “battle-bus” that toured the UK. Boris Johnson and Michael Gove fronted the Vote Leave campaign.
The main sticking point in finding agreement between the UK and the EU is the Brexiteer insistence that a customs border returns to Ireland. The reappearance of a hard border in Ireland could be very damaging for economies in both the north and south. One way around this is to have a border down the Irish Sea, but the DUP had clearly stated, until recent weeks, that it could never accept this. So this is where the real responsibility lies. Brexiteer intransigence.
So in addition to putting the blame where it should lie, the UK’s corporate media would do much better to reflect the changing opinion of the British people.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?