Rishi Sunak just showed his contempt for sick and disabled people. Because his Budget contained no extra support for countless numbers of them. And overall, Sunak may have deprived over one million sick and disabled people of some of their most basic needs.
Sunak: £20 here, £20 there
The chancellor confirmed in his Budget on Wednesday 3 March that the £20 uplift to Universal Credit would stay. But as the Mirror pointed out:
6 million [people]… face £20-a-week cut
This is because Sunak has only put the £20 increase in place until September. As the Mirror noted:
That means millions of Brits face a new ‘cliff-edge’ in Autumn.
It’s understood the Chancellor expects the £20-a-week to end in a brutal cut-off for millions of families.
The Canary previously reported on how some research called the £20 uplift “inadequate” anyway. It found that people were still financially struggling on Universal Credit. This was even with the extra money. But there are over one million people who have had no extra support at all. And Sunak did nothing in the Budget for these people.
Legacy benefits = no support
Some people still claim so-called ‘legacy benefits’. These include Employment and Support Allowance (ESA). And the government has not increased their social security payments in line with the Universal Credit/Working Tax Credits uplift.
The Oldham Times reported there are 2.2 million legacy benefit claimants, and that “three quarters of these are disabled people”. The campaign group Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) has been vocal about this issue. It’s been collecting stories from people on legacy benefits about how the lack of extra support has hit them. DPAC shared what some claimants think £20 extra a week could do for them. Their responses were stark and damning.
The most basic needs not met
- “I could buy proper incontinence pads instead of sanitary pads which leak”.
- “Could put the heating on earlier and not suffer the arthritis pain I am because I only put the heating on after 6pm”.
- “I could add credit to my phone so I could talk to someone as I haven’t spoken to anyone for months as I am shielding and do not have family”.
- “I would be able to bathe more”.
- “On chemo[therapy]… need to eat properly”.
- “It would make washing a permanent feature in our home”.
These are basic needs many people would take for granted. But for people on social security like ESA, Sunak’s inaction and lack of support has left them in an appalling situation; deprived of fundamental things.
A “human catastrophe” that has never stopped
DPAC said in a press release:
The government often claims to protect what it calls ‘the most vulnerable’ but once again it is precisely those who are ‘most vulnerable’ whose needs are being ignored. This has created a two tier social security system, giving the distinct impression that disabled people’s suffering is of no concern to this government… the government has absolutely no interest in even knowing what the right thing to do for disabled people is.
But this is nothing new. In 2016, the UN accused successive UK governments of “grave” and “systematic” violations of sick and disabled people’s human rights. The chair of the investigating committee went further. She accused UK governments of creating a “human catastrophe” for sick and disabled people. Over four years since the UN’s report, little has changed. For Sunak and the Tories to leave over one million sick and disabled people without additional support during a global pandemic is a disgrace. And it’s one that the chancellor’s Budget just compounded.
Featured image via Sky News – YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?