• Disrupting Power Since 2015
  • Donate
  • Login
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Hundreds of buildings still at risk of another Grenfell scale tragedy

Fréa Lockley by Fréa Lockley
28 January 2019
in News, UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
167 5
A A
1
Home UK News
320
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A Freedom of Information (FOI) response to Inside Housing has revealed that government funding to remove Grenfell Tower style cladding is not available for some buildings. This followed news that only 15% of similar cladding has been removed from privately owned high-rise buildings. 72 people were killed in the Grenfell Tower fire on 14 June 2017. A report for the public inquiry said that, among other things, evidence “strongly supports” the idea that the tower’s cladding played a role in the fire’s spread.

“No legal obligation for the owner to remove the dangerous material”

On 28 January, Inside Housing reported that:

A social housing tower block with Grenfell-style cladding was denied funding for the removal of the dangerous material because it was 64cm too short.

In June 2018, the government made a £400m pot of funding available for councils and housing associations to “strip dangerous combinations of aluminium cladding and insulation” from high rise buildings. So far, £248m has funded removal from 135 tower blocks. But this FOI request revealed that 12 blocks were denied funding and “didn’t meet the application criteria”. Three of those “were below the 18m [metres] which building regulations use to define a high rise”.

As Inside Housing reported, one tower block was “17.36m – just 64cm below the threshold”. But this building is “highly likely to be six stories high”. This means any fire could pose a similar threat to lives as at Grenfell. It stated:

But because of its height, no funding will be provided and there is no legal obligation for the owner to remove the dangerous material.

It’s thought the government does plan “to review the 18m threshold”. But until this happens, many buildings are still at risk of another Grenfell scale tragedy.

Steve Reed, Labour MP and fire safety campaigner, told Inside Housing this was “nonsensical”. He stated that “the only way to guarantee there will be no more Grenfells” is to remove “all flammable cladding on residential blocks”.

“People are left living in fear”

In the private sector, meanwhile, HuffPost reported that:

At Prime Minister’s Questions…Theresa May said 56 building owners were “refusing” to remove dangerous cladding from private buildings.

Housing minister Kit Malthouse, however, downplayed safety concerns. He said that “100%” of the 56 buildings “have temporary measures in place”. He insisted that measures were “certified’ as “appropriate” by local fire services.

Official figures from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government revealed that dangerous cladding – similar to that used on Grenfell Tower – has only been removed from 15% of high-rise buildings. HuffPost reported that “aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding” has only been stripped from “67 of 437 buildings in England above 18 metres”.

As a result, “370 high-rises” are likely to be falling short of “current building regulations”. Around 238 are privately owned properties. These buildings include student accommodation, private homes and hotels.

But Reed said that until cladding is removed, “people are left living in fear”.

As The Canary has also reported, there are similar concerns about the safety of fire doors in both council-owned and private buildings.

Featured image via Paula Peters – Twitter

Share128Tweet80
Previous Post

One man has moving words for the Tory councillor who wants to ‘tear down’ his tent

Next Post

A government-funded destabilisation network is forced to disable its own website

Next Post
Integrity Initiative website message

A government-funded destabilisation network is forced to disable its own website

BBC studio and Pablo Navarrete

Watch a guest demolish the BBC’s Venezuela propaganda straight to the broadcaster’s face

John McDonnell and Lowkey

John McDonnell teams up with rapper Lowkey to send a stark warning to the UK government

Protesters with banner

Global days of action held in solidarity with progressive Rojava revolution in northern Syria

Charlie Watson and the DWP logo

The DWP's latest 'claimant success story' is a globe-trotting TV extra

Please login to join discussion
Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more
Horoscopes

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

by Steve Topple
21 May 2025
DWP open source banking
Analysis

The DWP is quietly trying to get a private company to connect it to disabled people’s bank accounts

by Steve Topple
20 May 2025
gideon's chariots Gaza
Analysis

Gideon’s Chariots: leaked plan shows Israel intentionally pushing Gaza to famine and forced displacement

by Alaa Shamali
20 May 2025
Gideon's Chariots Gaza
Analysis

“عربات جدعون.. مخطط إسرائيلي يقود غزة نحو مجاعة مُمنهجة وتهجير قسري

by Alaa Shamali
20 May 2025
Our friends at Pauzeradio have got the perfect Reggae clothing line for this summer
Lifestyle

Our friends at Pauzeradio have got the perfect Reggae clothing line for this summer

by Steve Topple
20 May 2025
  • Contact
  • About & FAQ
  • Get our Daily News Email
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

The Canary is owned and run by independent journalists and volunteers, NOT offshore billionaires.

You can write for us, or support us by making a regular or one-off donation.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion

© 2023 Canary - Worker's co-op.

Before you go, have you seen...?

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more
Horoscopes
Steve Topple

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

DWP open source banking
Analysis
Steve Topple

The DWP is quietly trying to get a private company to connect it to disabled people’s bank accounts

gideon's chariots Gaza
Analysis
Alaa Shamali

Gideon’s Chariots: leaked plan shows Israel intentionally pushing Gaza to famine and forced displacement

Gideon's Chariots Gaza
Analysis
Alaa Shamali

“عربات جدعون.. مخطط إسرائيلي يقود غزة نحو مجاعة مُمنهجة وتهجير قسري

ADVERTISEMENT
Analysis
Nathan Spears

Vote for the Press Photograph of the Year 2024

Image by Burkard Meyendriesch from Pixabay
Feature
Nathan Spears

Why Santiago Ways is the Leading Choice for Walking the Camino de Santiago

Environment
Nathan Spears

EU elections point to growing public desire for new policymaking approach in Brussels