Hundreds of buildings still at risk of another Grenfell scale tragedy

Grenfell Tower

A Freedom of Information (FOI) response to Inside Housing has revealed that government funding to remove Grenfell Tower style cladding is not available for some buildings. This followed news that only 15% of similar cladding has been removed from privately owned high-rise buildings. 72 people were killed in the Grenfell Tower fire on 14 June 2017. A report for the public inquiry said that, among other things, evidence “strongly supports” the idea that the tower’s cladding played a role in the fire’s spread.

“No legal obligation for the owner to remove the dangerous material”

On 28 January, Inside Housing reported that:

A social housing tower block with Grenfell-style cladding was denied funding for the removal of the dangerous material because it was 64cm too short.

In June 2018, the government made a £400m pot of funding available for councils and housing associations to “strip dangerous combinations of aluminium cladding and insulation” from high rise buildings. So far, £248m has funded removal from 135 tower blocks. But this FOI request revealed that 12 blocks were denied funding and “didn’t meet the application criteria”. Three of those “were below the 18m [metres] which building regulations use to define a high rise”.

As Inside Housing reported, one tower block was “17.36m – just 64cm below the threshold”. But this building is “highly likely to be six stories high”. This means any fire could pose a similar threat to lives as at Grenfell. It stated:

But because of its height, no funding will be provided and there is no legal obligation for the owner to remove the dangerous material.

It’s thought the government does plan “to review the 18m threshold”. But until this happens, many buildings are still at risk of another Grenfell scale tragedy.

Read on...

Steve Reed, Labour MP and fire safety campaigner, told Inside Housing this was “nonsensical”. He stated that “the only way to guarantee there will be no more Grenfells” is to remove “all flammable cladding on residential blocks”.

“People are left living in fear”

In the private sector, meanwhile, HuffPost reported that:

At Prime Minister’s Questions…Theresa May said 56 building owners were “refusing” to remove dangerous cladding from private buildings.

Housing minister Kit Malthouse, however, downplayed safety concerns. He said that “100%” of the 56 buildings “have temporary measures in place”. He insisted that measures were “certified’ as “appropriate” by local fire services.

Official figures from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government revealed that dangerous cladding – similar to that used on Grenfell Tower – has only been removed from 15% of high-rise buildings. HuffPost reported that “aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding” has only been stripped from “67 of 437 buildings in England above 18 metres”.

As a result, “370 high-rises” are likely to be falling short of “current building regulations”. Around 238 are privately owned properties. These buildings include student accommodation, private homes and hotels.

But Reed said that until cladding is removed, “people are left living in fear”.

As The Canary has also reported, there are similar concerns about the safety of fire doors in both council-owned and private buildings.

Featured image via Paula Peters – Twitter

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Ever since Thatcher downgraded Building Regulations to guidance in England and Wales, standards of construction have steadily declined. Then in 1997 Major privatised Building Control, and there you have it. Shoddy compartmentation between flats, useless fire doors, and unsafe escape routes for when the ‘staying put’ policy is abandoned.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.