Sitting on the pavement in Somerset “without reasonable excuse” landed a homeless man with a 20-week jail sentence. According to County Gazette, the man was also convicted of two other similar offences.
‘A high risk of begging’
A Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO) banned the man from sitting on the pavement. He was sentenced to three concurrent 20-week prison sentences and ordered to pay a £115 victim surcharge.
County Gazette reported:
The court heard there was considered to be a high risk that he could be seen to be begging and that his deliberate actions were the latest in a line of deliberate breaches of the order.
Criminal Behaviour Orders
CBOs replaced Anti Social Behaviour Orders in 2014 when Theresa May was home secretary. But charities widely criticise the orders for criminalising homeless people. Dale Parker, co-founder of The People’s Picnic, told the BBC in 2017:
More often than not, the only crime those people have committed is the crime of being poor.
Meanwhile, a Guardian investigation in 2018 found that hundreds of:
vulnerable homeless people are being fined, given criminal convictions and even imprisoned for begging and rough sleeping
It also reported that 50 local authorities use Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs). Councils can use these orders to criminalise a range of behaviour, including rough sleeping, begging, and drinking in the street. The Guardian said:
Lawyers, charities and campaigners described the findings as “grotesque inhumanity”, saying disadvantaged groups were fined for being poor.
Breaching a PSPO is only punishable by a fine. But a conviction under a PSPO can then lead to a CBO being imposed. And breaching a CBO can mean up to five years in jail.
So in simple terms, a person could end up facing five years in prison for an ‘offence’ such as persistent begging because they have a CBO. But without a CBO, they’d only receive a fine.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?