The number of long-term empty homes in Scotland has risen 5.5% in a year, new figures suggest.
National Records of Scotland statistics show 39,300 homes were empty for six months or more in 2018, an increase of 2,000 on 2017.
— NatRecordsScot (@NatRecordsScot) June 18, 2019
Scottish islands have the highest proportions of long-term empty homes, at 4.7% in the Shetland Islands and 3.4% in the Western Isles compared to 1.5% across mainland Scotland.
Overall, the statistics show 96% of homes in Scotland are occupied, 1% are second homes and 3% are empty.
The report states:
There were 2.62 million dwellings in Scotland in 2018…
Remote rural areas had the highest percentage of dwellings that were vacant or second homes.
The number of households across Scotland has continued to rise, hitting 2.48 million in 2018, an increase of around 139,000 (6%) in a decade.
Officials credit the growth to an increasing population and rising number of homes combined with a drop in the average number of people per household.
Homes with only one resident have been the most common type since 2010 and now account for more than a third of households, with an estimated 885,000 people living alone in 2017, which researchers said could be partly explained by Scotland’s ageing population.
“People are crying out for affordable housing”
Andy Wightman, housing spokesman for the Scottish Greens, said:
People are crying out for affordable housing, yet we have a total of over 100,000 empty and under-used second homes across Scotland.
It’s incredulous that the proportion of empty homes is rising and astonishing that not all councils have empty homes officers to bring properties into use.
He repeated calls for the Scottish government to work with local authorities to tackle the issue, saying it is “clearly exacerbating Scotland’s housing crisis”.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?