Sadiq Khan challenges the conflict and suffering caused by the world’s largest arms fair

Sadiq Khan and a bombed building in Yemen
Fréa Lockley

London mayor Sadiq Khan has spoken out against the world’s largest arms fair. As protests continue against the Defence Security and Equipment International (DSEI) arms fair, Khan’s open letter also makes the link between the “arms and weapons” being sold and the people who’ve fled conflicts where such weapons are used.

“Prevent this event from taking place”

DSEI takes place every two years at the ExCeL centre in London. It describes itself as:

The world leading event that connects governments, national armed forces, industry thought leaders and the global defence & security supply chain on an unrivalled scale.

In 2019, it runs from 10 to 13 September. 

In a letter to DSEI event director Grant Burgham seen by the Independent, Khan said he “strongly” opposed “this event taking place in London”. He continued:

London is a global city, which is home to individuals who have fled conflict and suffered as a consequence of arms and weapons like those exhibited at DSEI.

Khan also said:

I will take any opportunity available to prevent this event from taking place at the Royal Docks in future years.

The London mayor stated that he is “opposed to London being used as a marketplace for the trade of weapons”. In response, Burgham claimed DSEI:

plays an important role in supporting the Ministry of Defence’s procurement needs, helping deliver British jobs and economic growth, and deepening the UK’s partnerships on a global stage.

Costs

Action and protests to stop DSEI started on 2 September. As The Canary reported, there’s a large police presence in place.

According to the Independent, Khan also called on the arms fair organisers to fund the cost of policing demonstrations against the arms fair. It also stated:

Policing protests at DSEI 2017 cost the force almost £1m in total, including £823,750 in officers’ pay, £154,100 in overtime and £20,073 in “direct costs” such as vehicles and food.

More than 2,800 police officer shifts were needed to cover the 12-day operation.

Sources on the ground told The Canary that, so far, there have been around 115 anti-arms protester arrests.

Andrew Smith from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) called the police response “heavy-handed”. He continued:

The best way for the government to cut the policing cost would be to shut down DSEI.

Smith also welcomed Khan’s “strong statement” and said:

DSEI is a moral disgrace and should be firmly opposed, whether it is taking place in London or anywhere else.

It will bring a roll call of the world’s most repressive regimes together with all of the biggest arms companies. They will be there for one reason: to sell as many weapons as possible, regardless of the consequences.

Burgham stated:

Government agencies responsible for enforcing the law at DSEI are on site during setup and throughout the exhibition.

He claimed DSEI would meet “all security costs incurred as a direct result of the event”. And he told the Independent that organisers “fully respect the right to lawful protest”.

“Complicit”

Activist action against DSEI is ongoing. On 9 September, CAAT shared images of a giant banner placed opposite ExCeL:

CAAT noted that activists dropped this banner:

to shine light on the UK government’s complicity with the arms trade and continuing sales to oppressive regimes and known human rights abusers…

Through hosting DSEI our government is culpable for the killing and suffering of innocent civilians worldwide; State sanctioned terrorism.

Featured images via Wikimedia – Ffzldn / Flickr – Felton Davis

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us