Nicola Sturgeon claims Alex Salmond is hindering the cause of independence

Support us and go ad-free

Alex Salmond is now hindering, and not helping, the cause of Scottish independence, his successor Nicola Sturgeon has insisted.

The first minister and SNP leader also questioned the message it would send to women if Salmond returned to Holyrood after May’s election.

Alba Party

Salmond was dramatically unveiled as the leader of the new pro-independence Alba Party at the start of the Scottish election campaign.

The new party is only fielding candidates on the ‘regional list’ section of the ballot. With one opinion poll putting the party on 3%, Sturgeon stressed that “we shouldn’t assume that Alex Salmond is going to return MSP to Holyrood”.

But she insisted she “could not envisage” working with him or his new party.

Speaking to PA Scotland, she said:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

We can’t bulldoze our way to independence, we have to build support, persuade people, win trust and confidence.

And when I listen to what is coming out of his new outfit I fear that is more likely to drive the undecided former No voters that we need to attract away from the independence cause rather than to us.

Sturgeon, who succeeded Salmond as first minister and SNP leader in 2014, said she did not know yet what Salmond’s new Alba Party “stands for politically, in terms of policy”. But she added that “any party that can attract the seal of approval of Nigel Farage sounds alarm bells ringing in my head”.

Her comments came after the former UKIP and Brexit Party leader reportedly said: “We are very similar, Alex and I”.

Falling out

There’s been a very public falling out between the first minister and her former friend and mentor. It’s resulted from the Scottish government’s handling of sexual harassment allegations against Salmond dating back to when he was in power.

Sturgeon made clear:

I can’t and don’t envisage working with him, or his new party.

She stated:

That’s not about personal differences. It is firstly because what I think he is doing hinders the cause of independence rather than helps it.

In the short term that is because I think…..there is a risk that asking people to gamble with their vote actually jeopardises an SNP majority.

But beyond that, the tone and the approach he is striking I don’t think is necessarily particularly helpful to building a majority of the population behind independence.

“Conduct towards women”

Sturgeon again raised concerns about whether it was appropriate for her predecessor to return to public office. She said “I don’t think it sends a very good message”.

Speaking about his “conduct towards women”, she said that Salmond “seems unable to acknowledge the kind of behaviour he conceded during his criminal trial – where he was acquitted of criminality – was inappropriate”.

This, she insisted, “presents a pretty big barrier to me ever having any kind of dealings with him”.

Sturgeon added:

I could give lots of tactical, political answers, but that is just the honest answer to the situation.

Salmond was cleared of a series of sexual assault allegations following a High Court trial in Edinburgh last year. While Sturgeon added that Salmond had “conceded behaving in certain ways”, the first minister stated:

Part of the problem I have is he hasn’t, as far as I am concerned, accepted that it was inappropriate and shown any signs of having reflected on it, or apologised for it. And that’s a big issue.

I think that raises big, big questions of the appropriateness of a return to public life and public office.

Because he won’t accept that aspects of his behaviour may have been deeply inappropriate, he is giving the impression a man in a powerful position can behave how he wants towards women, and as long as it doesn’t meet a threshold of criminality it is fine. I just fundamentally disagree with that.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’d let the citizens work it out what they think about the Salmon rather than debate about the moral details now on who is best for later.
      Talk about being distracted by the politics of power.
      But sex is a funny one, and so close to the politic mind.
      They go hand in hand argueing all the way on the future which has never happened.

      1. What were the details of the complaint? And on what basis? Just an attention seeking idiot or Profumo take two? Ultimately if he has done something wrong he should take responsibility and as it is now interlinked, universally, ultimately if they are struggling with a very simple issue, maybe it is Profumo take two after all?

    2. ‘It’s resulted from the Scottish government’s handling of sexual harassment allegations against Salmond dating back to when he was in power.’

      Actually, what started the situation that exists now in Scottish politics was the inappropriate behaviour of Alex Salmond towards women in his employ.

      The Scottish government got the procedure of its enquiry into the sexual harassment allegations wrong: something that it has acknowledged and for which it has apologised. However, the substance of those allegations was absolutely correct: something Salmond has acknowledged but for which he seems incapable of apologising.

    3. Ultimately this is decision for the people of Scotland unless it impacts on the Hanoverian accession, which introduced not only an accession through a cousin of Queen Anne but a new political establishment, the basis of how the financial services sector now works but also the crushing of the Jacobite rebellion and Walpole’s policies, but don’t forget about the music of the Hanoverian accession as well!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.