• Disrupting Power Since 2015
  • Donate
  • Login
Wednesday, May 14, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Protections for older children in care vanished overnight

Sophia Purdy-Moore by Sophia Purdy-Moore
9 September 2021
in News, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
170 2
A A
0
Home UK News
319
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On 9 September, a new law came into force banning the use of unregulated settings for children in care aged 15 and younger in England. Given the lack of support and security children placed in unregulated accommodation receive, some regard the ban as a positive move towards protecting under-16s in care. But according to children’s rights charity Article 39, this change in the law will harm thousands of vulnerable 16 and 17-year-old children in care, leaving them to cope alone with minimal support.

Leaving vulnerable children to fend for themselves

Following a BBC Newsnight investigation which exposed stories of abuse and exploitation in unregulated accommodation, the Department for Education launched a consultation on these settings. Unregulated accommodation includes shared houses, bedsits, flats and hostels, which aren’t required to meet children’s homes standards. These settings aren’t registered as housing children in the care of the state, and aren’t subject to inspection. Children in unregulated settings are provided with little to no care or support from adults.

Setting out the problems with some unregulated settings, then-CEO of youth justice charity Just for Kids Law Enver Solomon said:

They include lack of oversight, minimal key worker contact time for young people, high numbers of out of area placements, frequent placement moves, children being housed alongside adults including those who engage in risk-taking behaviours, properties that are dirty, run-down or lack basic furnishings and at the worst end of the scale, leave children and young people at risk of violence or exploitation.

In September 2020, the children’s commissioner published a report setting out why “no child under the age of 18 should be placed in an unregulated setting”. In spite of calls for the government to ban placing under-18s in unregulated settings, in February, education secretary Gavin Williamson announced plans to introduce a ban that only protects children under the age of 16.

A change to the law

On 9 September, the new law came into force banning the use of unregulated settings for children in care aged 15 and younger in England. A Department for Education spokesperson said:

Councils can no longer place under-16s in unregulated accommodation. Looked after children under the age of 16 should either be in a foster placement or a registered children’s home, as will many 16 and 17-year-olds. However, it may be the right option for some 16 and 17-year-olds to move from a supported children’s home to unregulated settings as they are ready to become more independent.

They added:

These settings must be of high quality and provide appropriate support. We have consulted on national standards that each of these settings must meet, as well as taking views on Ofsted-led registration and inspection.

Calling this “a dreadful day for children in care in England”, children’s rights charity Article 39 director Carolyne Willow told The Canary:

Ministers have changed the law to make it mandatory that children in care are cared for where they live, but they have only applied this to those aged 15 and younger. What kind of parent decides to ration care to children on the basis of age? What kind of parent looks at their daughter or son approaching their 16th birthday and thinks they’ll soon be able to manage without care? What kind of parent would make it a family rule that only children under the age of 16 are guaranteed care? 

In May, the charity found that only around 100 under-16s would benefit from the legal change, while around 6,000 16 and 17-year-olds in care are living in unregulated accommodation.

Taking it to the courts

On 17 August, the high court approved a judicial review launched by Article 39 on the grounds that “this change to the law is discriminatory and an injustice to older children in care”.

Willow told The Canary:

These are children who are in the care of the state, family courts have made care orders in respect of many of them. It beggars belief that we’re having to go to court to argue that this legal change discriminates against 16 and 17 year-olds. Boys and children from black, Asian and minority ethnic communities will be hardest hit by this change to the law. It’s simply intolerable.

In November, the children’s rights charity launched another legal challenge. In this case, the court of appeal found that the education secretary acted unlawfully in removing safeguards for children in care at the beginning of the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic without consulting children’s rights organisations.

Article 39 is looking to raise £5k to fund the upcoming judicial review. And charity Together Trust is seeking 5,000 signatures, calling on the state to provide care for looked after children up to the age of 18.

Featured image via Jesús Rodríguez/Unsplash

Share128Tweet80
Previous Post

Exclusive: Met Police refuses to tell us if it holds information on The Canary

Next Post

Nature charity tells government to stop British banks funding deforestation

Next Post
Nature charity tells government to stop British banks funding deforestation

Nature charity tells government to stop British banks funding deforestation

An armoured vehicle

Anti-arms trade campaigners need your help this weekend

Cressida Dick

Met Police give commissioner their ‘full support' despite corruption allegations

An NHS nurse has made a video about their pay rise

An NHS nurse's video sums up the Tories' degrading pay rise

war on terror media

The 'war on terror' couldn't have happened without mainstream media

Please login to join discussion
The British Museum just held an event with the Israeli embassy - and the Met police responded by repressing Palestine protesters
News

British Museum holds event with the Israeli embassy – so Met Police respond by repressing Palestine protesters

by The Canary
14 May 2025
EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer's in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London
Analysis

EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer’s in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London

by Ed Sykes
14 May 2025
People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour's DWP benefit cuts
News

People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour’s DWP benefit cuts

by The Canary
14 May 2025
Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech: channeling the racist rhetoric of Enoch Powell
Opinion

Is Keir Starmer capable of killing?

by Jamie Driscoll
14 May 2025
As an ACTUAL GENOCIDE continues, its apologists come for Gary Lineker over an emoji
Opinion

As an ACTUAL GENOCIDE continues, its apologists come for Gary Lineker over an emoji

by Ed Sykes
14 May 2025
  • Contact
  • About & FAQ
  • Get our Daily News Email
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

The Canary is owned and run by independent journalists and volunteers, NOT offshore billionaires.

You can write for us, or support us by making a regular or one-off donation.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion

© 2023 Canary - Worker's co-op.

Before you go, have you seen...?

The British Museum just held an event with the Israeli embassy - and the Met police responded by repressing Palestine protesters
News
The Canary

British Museum holds event with the Israeli embassy – so Met Police respond by repressing Palestine protesters

EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer's in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London
Analysis
Ed Sykes

EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer’s in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London

People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour's DWP benefit cuts
News
The Canary

People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour’s DWP benefit cuts

Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech: channeling the racist rhetoric of Enoch Powell
Opinion
Jamie Driscoll

Is Keir Starmer capable of killing?

ADVERTISEMENT
Business
Nathan Spears

When digital isn’t enough: why paper still matters in modern business

Tech
Nathan Spears

How Digital Addictions Are Formed in the Shadow of Large Platforms

Lifestyle
Nathan Spears

Recovery in the Sun: How the Canary Islands are Becoming a Wellness Tourism Hub