Met Police give commissioner their ‘full support’ despite corruption allegations

Cressida Dick
Support us and go ad-free

Metropolitan Police officers have given their “full support” to commissioner Cressida Dick after critics called for her to be replaced. Dick recently refused to accept the findings of an independent panel that uncovered institutional corruption in the force.

Popular with the police

Ken Marsh is chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation which represents more than 30,000 officers in London. He said Dick had the “full support of the rank and file”.

Marsh told the PA news agency that Dick’s leadership had been “excellent”. He added that Dick’s “ability to communicate with officers of all ranks is quite incredible”.

It comes after a number of high-profile figures signed an open letter to the prime minister. The letter accused Dick of “presiding over a culture of incompetence and cover-up” following reports she had been offered a two-year extension to her contract.

Police reforms

The letter sent earlier this week urged Boris Johnson to replace the commissioner, arguing that she:

must be properly investigated for her conduct, along with predecessors and those in her inner circle, who she appointed and who have questions to answer.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Signatories included baroness Doreen Lawrence, lady Diana Brittan, former Tory MP Harvey Proctor, and broadcaster Paul Gambaccini. All of them have expressed disappointment or criticism of the police over cases affecting them. Their letter also urged the police watchdog, the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC), to introduce reforms.

Marsh told PA that he understands “fully” the positions the letter signatories are in and his “heart goes out to them”. He said he didn’t have an issue with police reform “whatsoever”, but said “that’s for the Government to decide”.

Institutional corruption

The independent panel which found corruption looked into the death of private investigator Daniel Morgan and the subsequent police handling of the case. The report found:

Concealing or denying failings, for the sake of the organisation’s public image, is dishonesty on the part of the organisation for reputational benefit and constitutes a form of institutional corruption.

Chairwoman and baroness Nuala O’Loan told the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee:

We have found the Met to be institutionally corrupt and the responses by senior officers to the report have been most disappointing.

The public statements which we have heard from the Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner (and) Assistant Commissioner in the days following the publication illustrate exactly the problem we have been describing.

The peer said senior officers “have continued to lack candour” in their public statements even after the publication of the damning report.

Dishonesty and betrayal

Moreover, baroness O’Loan said “incompetence and corrupt acts” had hampered all the investigations into Morgan’s death. She said:

The Met, as an organisation, has not responded honestly to the public and to the family about the serious failures including incompetence and corrupt acts in the murder investigations over the past 34 years

She added:

The Metropolitan Police has placed concern for its reputation above the public interest.

There has been dishonesty for the benefit of the reputation of the organisation and that is institutional corruption, and the statements made on behalf of the Met have continued to lack candour, even after the publication of our report when they referred specifically only to the failings in the first investigation.

She further stated:

This is a betrayal of the family, and it’s also a betrayal of the public and of good, honest officers. And it will diminish trust.

Federation response

A separate statement from Marsh’s federation said it “fully supports” Dick’s contract extension, adding:

It is easy to comment and criticise from the sidelines.

It added:

Whilst the federation does not always agree with the Commissioner – the same goes for anyone who holds that post – we think she is doing a good job in difficult circumstances.

Many of the voices we hear calling for the Commissioner to go are the same ones who, following the Clapham Common vigil earlier this year, rounded on our colleagues criticising their work. They were, of course, proven to be completely wrong when Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary looked at the policing of the event.

In July, The Canary covered a report that found “significant failings” in the policing of the mentioned vigil. The report added that the policing was “unlawful and breached fundamental rights”.


On 10 September, Proctor warned that Dick should be replaced to avoid any future “errors” by the Met. The ex-Tory MP was one of three men who had their houses raided by officers from the Met’s failed Operation Midland. The operation was launched in reaction to false allegations by jailed fantasist Carl Beech about a murderous VIP paedophile ring.

Gambaccini, who was falsely accused of historical sex offences, said:

Londoners deserve a first class police service, they do not currently have one.

Baroness Lawrence – mother of teenager Stephen Lawrence who died in a racist attack in 1993 – has previously voiced her disappointment after an investigation into her son’s death was shelved last year.

Lady Brittan’s home was raided when her late husband lord Brittan was falsely accused of child abuse as part of Operation Midland. She previously told the Home Affairs Select Committee that public figures caught up in the scandal had still not received justice.

A Home Office spokesperson previously said:

The appointment of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service is a formal process which will be confirmed in the proper way.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us