• Donate
  • Login
Sunday, June 7, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Man shot dead by police was not a danger to anyone, family says after inquest

The Canary by The Canary
16 October 2021
in News, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
160 13
A A
4
Home UK News
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

There was nothing to suggest a “confused and frightened” man who was shot dead by police “was aggressive or a danger to anyone on that day”, his family said after an inquest jury found he was unlawfully killed.

Shot in the back

Lewis Skelton, 31, died after he was shot twice in the back by an officer in Hull city centre when tasers had no effect, an inquest jury heard. Hull Coroner’s Court was told how Skelton was carrying an axe and had failed to respond to officers’ instructions to stop before he died five years ago. There were emotional scenes in court on 22 October after the jury returned its unanimous conclusion following eight hours of deliberation.

Humberside Police said it was “disappointed” by the decision, pointing out that the police watchdog had cleared the officers involved and flagging-up a recent change in the law which makes it easier for juries to hold officers accountable for their actions.

In a statement read outside court by his sister Tia, Skelton’s family said:

The jury has confirmed what we all knew, the killing of Lewis was wrong and it was unlawful and he should still be with us today.

Tia Skelton said:

There was nothing to suggest Lewis was aggressive or a danger to anyone on that day. He was confused and frightened. His final moments being must have been ones of terror and fear, and that is so hard for us as a family to know.

The family criticised reports at the time that Lewis was “a crazed axe man” and “axe wielding”. Tia Skelton said:

All who have seen and heard the evidence during this inquest will have come to realise those descriptions of Lewis on that day could not have been further from the truth. We are grateful to the members of the jury who recognised that the people in the wrong were the officers of Humberside Police, and not Lewis.

The statement concluded:

What happened to Lewis has torn our family apart and broken all our hearts, affecting each and every one of us in unique and different ways. Lewis needed help but he was killed. He should never have been taken from us.

Tia Skelton, centre, the sister of Lewis Skelton, is surrounded by members of their family and solicitor Neil Hudgell, left, as she reads a statement to the media outside Hull Coroner's Court
Tia Skelton, centre, the sister of Lewis Skelton, is surrounded by members of their family and solicitor Neil Hudgell, left, as she reads a statement to the media outside Hull Coroner’s Court (Dave Higgens/PA)

“Low threat situation”

The jury heard that Humberside Police received a number of 999 calls on 29 November 2016, saying a man was walking down Holderness Road carrying an axe. Armed police were deployed and two officers caught up with him.

The officer who fired the fatal shots – only identified as B50 – described how Skelton failed to stop when challenged and the use of taser four times by both he and his colleague – identified only as Charlie – had no effect. He fired two live rounds in Francis Street from his Glock 17 pistol as Skelton approached a group of workmen and he said he believed their lives were at risk.

Skelton’s parents, Helen and Glen Skelton, have described how their son was a passionate Liverpool fan who also loved music and animals. They said their son struggled with mental health problems.

In a formal witness statement read to the court, Glen Skelton said his son started taking heroin when he was about 18 after getting in with the “wrong crowd”. He later developed psychosis and the jury heard he had recently stopped taking his medication when he was shot.

“Low threat situation”

Humberside Police’s assistant chief constable Chris Noble said:

We are disappointed with this conclusion and are concerned that it does not undermine the confidence of officers to act decisively when making split-second decisions to protect the public.

Noble said the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation found that the actions taken by the officer “were proportionate to the risk that was identified to members of the public”.

Noble said a recent change in law meant that inquest juries no longer had to use the criminal standard of “beyond reasonable doubt” to come to an unlawful killing conclusion. He said:

Additionally, the jury had to make its decision in very different circumstances to those that confronted the officers on the day. Our officers responded to four 999 calls to a man armed with, and waving, an unsheathed axe marching towards the city centre who did not stop despite four attempts to Taser him.

Writing for The Canary, Sophia Purdy-Moore has reported on the long history of police officers getting away with what victims’ relatives have called murder.

Family solicitor Neil Hudgell said:

Lewis had walked past many people, but not approached anyone. Yes, people had expressed concern, but people were not threatened, and when police armed response teams were alerted, they were told it was a ‘low threat situation’.

Sadly, from that point, a series of events unfolded in which decisions were made which were wholly inappropriate for the situation.

Tags: justicemental healthpolice
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

United Families & Friends Campaign remembers victims of UK state violence

Next Post

Matt Hancock United Nation Africa job offer withdrawn

Next Post
Matt Hancock giving a thumbs up

Matt Hancock United Nation Africa job offer withdrawn

Murdered MP remembered as ‘Mr Southend’ at vigil in his memory

Murdered MP remembered as ‘Mr Southend’ at vigil in his memory

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe ‘loses latest appeal in Iran’

The Veterans for Peace logo and the Wikileaks logo

Tribunal to combat disinformation on the prosecution of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange

Richard Ratcliffe

British Government ‘does not deal with problems until they become crises’

Comments 4

  1. Pingback: Man shot dead by police was not a danger to anyone, family says after inquest – Critical News Autoblog
  2. westham-mike says:
    5 years ago

    Of course he wasn’t a danger to anybody, but armed Police hate to be called out and not get to kill somebody.
    If somebody doesn’t ‘Comply@ immediately to a Policeman with a gun then that Policeman feels justified in killing them. The IOPC are only there to help the Police cover up their mistakes and wrong doing.
    We need a body that i fit for purpose when it comes to investigating the Police.
    The public (Rightly) has no faith in the IOPC and can see that they are just a body designed to cover for the Police.

    Reply
    • Frank Sterle Jr. says:
      5 years ago

      Sometimes law enforcers — be they private-property security, community police, prison guards, heavily-armed rapid-response police units or DEA — must be permitted to relax their nerves on a particularly stressful day by way of playing rough-’em-up and football-tackle with an ‘uncooperative suspect’, though not officially sanctioned. In itself, that may act something like icing on the cake of the primary-pay-and-perks authority-figure job role. …

      Reply
  3. Frank Sterle Jr. says:
    5 years ago

    Although society (including me) needs law-enforcers to protect the law-abiding and vulnerable people, I believe that to have a reasonable idea of how law-enforcers will behave, I believe, one must understand what underlying nature/desire motivated them to their profession to start with. Maybe many law enforcers target/acquire such authoritative fields of employment mainly for ‘power’ reasons, though perhaps subconsciously.

    It is, after all, a profession in which, besides the basic tackle and/or handcuffing, adrenalin-pumped employees might storm into suspects’ homes, screaming, with fully-automatic machineguns or handguns drawn, at the homes’ occupants, all of whom, including infants, can be permanently traumatized from the experience. Occasionally the law-enforcers force their way into the wrong home, altogether; that is when open-fire can and does occur, followed by wrongful deaths to be ‘impartially’ investigated.

    Almost all of us guys, as some gals, have as children fantasized about, and even planned for, a future as law enforcers in some form or another. But almost all of us, probably sooner than later, grew out of that dream, as it wasn’t reflective of our nature. Those who deliberately get into such professions of (potential or actual) physical authority might do some honest soul-searching as to truly why. Although that may sound cynical, I believe there is much truth to it. It must also be kept in mind that there are people who leave law-enforcement professions after witnessing misconduct within.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Donald Trump looking tired on Air Force One
Global

Trump set to shackle US economy to failing AI industry

by Willem Moore
7 June 2026
Zia Yusuf or Reform UK and Laura Kuenssberg
Trending

Zia Yusuf gives Henry Nowak’s family two fingers with unbelievable claim

by Willem Moore
7 June 2026
Reform Kemi Badenoch, Jacob Rees-Mogg, and Nigel Farage
Trending

Rees-Mogg urges Tories to step down for Reform

by Willem Moore
7 June 2026
David Lammy and Laura Kuenssberg
Trending

David Lammy denies police are ‘institutionally racist’

by Willem Moore
7 June 2026
Keir Starmer and Met Police officers - Mandelson
Trending

Met police suggest Number 10 lied about Mandelson emails

by Willem Moore
7 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart