State pension underpayments are ‘shameful shambles’

A pile of coins on a bed of cash

The long-term underpayment of state pensioners, an unknown number of whom will have died without receiving what they were owed, is a “shameful shambles”, according to a public spending watchdog.

Shambolic

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) estimates it has underpaid 134,000 pensioners over £1bn of their state pension entitlement. Most of them are women, and some errors date as far back as 1985.

In January 2021, the DWP started an exercise to correct the errors. This was the ninth such exercise since 2018, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said. The errors mostly affect widows, divorcees, and women who rely on their husband’s pension contributions for some of their pension. Complex pension rules and a reliance on highly manual systems led to the underpayment of tens of thousands of pensioners.

The committee of MPs said the underlying IT system used to manage millions of pensioner records dates back to 1988. Quality checks failed to identify the systematic underpayments and small errors added up over years to significant sums of money. The PAC said the department should consider whether there are cost-effective ways to upgrade its IT systems “as a matter of urgency”.

There’s currently no formal plan for contacting the next of kin where a pensioner who was underpaid is dead, the committee said.

Read on...

The DWP is only paying those it has identified as having a legal entitlement to arrears, in some cases many years after the event. And it’s been inconsistent in paying interest, it added. It’s also shown little interest in understanding the further knock-on consequences, including on social care provision, for those it underpaid, MPs said.

The cost of getting it wrong

Fixing DWP’s mistakes is expected to cost £24.3m in staff costs alone by the end of 2023, the PAC added. Experienced staff have been moved away from business-as-usual for the job. And the department is experiencing backlogs in processing new applications.

The risk remains that the errors that led to underpayments in the first place will be repeated in the correction exercise, if not also in new claims.

Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the PAC, said:

Departments that make errors through maladministration have a duty to put those it wronged back in the position they should have been, without the error.

In reality DWP can never make up what people have actually lost, over decades, and in many cases it’s not even trying. An unknown number of pensioners died without ever getting their due and there is no current plan to pay back their estates.

DWP is now on its ninth go at fixing these mistakes since 2018, the specialised staff diverted to fix this mess costing tens of millions more to the taxpayer and predictable consequences in delays to new pension claims.

And there is no assurance that the errors that led to these underpayments in the first place will not be repeated in the correction exercise.

This is a shameful shambles.

‘Quality’ checks

Quality checks failed to identify the systematic underpayment of thousands of pensioners.

The PAC said an absence of regular reporting on state pension inquiries makes it concerned that senior management “is not focused on designing a data strategy that detects errors in a more systematic way”. It also said the department should be treating state pension underpayments as seriously as overpayments.

Additionally, the DWP hasn’t given people who are worried they’ve been underpaid enough information to find out what they should do, the committee said. Its communications strategy is to only contact those whom it finds have been underpaid. And its priority has been to focus on living pensioners rather than the dead, even though some of their next of kin may be financially vulnerable, the committee added.

It said the DWP hasn’t been sufficiently transparent to parliament about the underpayments and should provide periodic updates.

The MPs added:

Despite a campaign by the former pensions minister, Sir Steve Webb and ThisisMoney.co.uk, from January 2020, the department did not consider underpayments to be a significant issue until August 2020, meaning that it missed opportunities to identify and resolve the problem sooner.

Paying pensioners lump sums in arrears may also affect benefits entitlements. But the department has shown “little interest in accounting for financial consequences”, the committee said. It said the DWP should establish the full impact of receiving a lump sum. And it should make sure people aren’t being treated prejudicially compared with if they’d received the money when it was meant to be paid.

A narrow scope

There must also be a risk that similar unidentified errors exist elsewhere in the system, the PAC said. It added:

Steve Webb has told us he believes the scope of the correction exercise is too narrow.

Webb, who is now a partner at consultants LCP (Lane Clark & Peacock), said:

The committee are right to be highly critical of DWP over this whole debacle.

It is shocking that DWP’s regular checks regarded the level of error on state pensions as too small to be worth investigating when in reality many thousands of people have missed out on potentially life-changing amounts of money.

Webb added:

There are still far too many people missing out on the state pension to which they are entitled and DWP needs to track them all down as a matter of urgency.

A DWP spokesperson said:

Resolving the historical state pension underpayments that have been made by successive governments is a priority for the department and we are committed to doing so as quickly as possible.

We have set up a dedicated team and devoted significant resources to processing outstanding cases, and have introduced new quality control processes and improved training to help ensure this does not happen again. Those affected will be contacted by us to ensure they receive all that they are owed.

We are carefully considering the content of the Public Accounts Committee’s report and will respond formally in due course.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The problem with women receiving their correct state pensions has been a problem for many years. I retired 13 years ago, and, being male, I have received my proper pension entitlement.

      When I was working I was head of a large public sector establishment with the majority of employees being female. Last century, as people approached retirement, we, in conjunction with trade unions tried to establish what employees’ state pension entitlements were. For men, this was almost always unproblematic, but in around half of the cases of women, there were frequently difficulties. The problems had their roots in four factors. Firstly, on marrying, women of that period took their husband’s surname. Secondly, as a consequence of marriage, their tax and NI records were merged into their husband’s. Thirdly, when women had children, it was as common as not for them to give up working for several years. Fourthly, if married women were widowed or divorced and remarried, this often entailed a change of surname, and, since their pension entitlement was based on their husband’s contributions, these contributions often did not follow the woman, but were either forgotten or remained with the late or ex-husband.

      The unique national insurance number, theoretically, should have prevented these problems happening, but, because the systems were manual, mistakes were made.

      Fortunately, we were able to rectify the problems, but it took a lot of time and determination. As a result of our early experiences we advised our female colleagues who were approaching retirement age to start the process several years before their proposed retirement date.

      It should be noted that it is not only state pensions which had problems. Most public sector organisations had occupational pensions which had contributions deducted from pay. As an example, in the case of my wife who had a career gap of five years for child rearing (her choice!). She resumed work with the same organisation, but on a job-sharing basis and then with an additional part-time post in another workplace. Although the pay office was able to reconcile these two so that she received a single consolidated payment each month, the occupational pension service allocated her a new number for the second workplace and, unknown to her for several years, she was contributing to two pensions. When she discovered this and asked the pension service to reconcile the two under her original pension number, she was told that this was not possible. So, until she retired, she contributed to two pensions with the same provider. On retirement, she then had to arrange for these to be combined so that she received her total entitlement. She actually has five pension streams, since, in addition to her own state pension, she is entitled to a pension based on my contributions, plus the two occupational ones, there was a small contributory one she was advised to take out when she left for maternity reasons. It turned out this was ‘mis-sold’ and she subsequently received compensation.

      This is a complex issue and really requires far more attention so that the women concerned can get their full entitlement.

      Add to the fact that, as in the case of women employees of Glasgow City council a malign conspiracy between Labour councillors and trade unions meant that women were not given proper equality of payment and, consequently, smaller pensions.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.