Jack Ritchie’s parents speak out ahead of inquest into his death

Support us and go ad-free

The parents of a 24-year-old gambling addict who ended his life have said changes to betting laws could save lives but have been delayed.

An inquest for Jack Ritchie is taking place this week. It will consider issues including the state’s involvement in his death, such as medical care he received and information he had about gambling risks.

Failures on the part of UK authorities

Ritchie was a Hull University history graduate. He was working as an English teacher when he died in Hanoi, Vietnam, in November 2017, after years of gambling problems dating back to his teens.

His parents, Charles and Liz Ritchie, have spent the last four years arguing that failures on the part of UK authorities to address gambling issues contributed to their son’s death. And they’ve been campaigning for reform through the Gambling With Lives charity which they set up.

The parents said Ritchie began gambling under-age at 17 when he and friends would use dinner money to play fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs) at a betting shop.

They believe an undiagnosed gambling disorder lay behind his death. And they’ve argued there were no public health warnings about the risk to life posed by gambling products. Moreover, they’ve said their son was not diagnosed or offered treatment that linked his symptoms to gambling disorder.

Read on...

‘Every day someone else dies’

Charles Ritchie told the PA news agency on Sunday 20 October:

Jack’s inquest will give him respect and we’re very grateful that we have a legal process that will consider what happened to our son.

That there is a coroner listening intently to the evidence about his death is significant for us and for everyone who believes that gambling affected their lost family member.

The inquest comes at a time the Government is reviewing our gambling laws but continues to delay the changes which we believe will save lives.

We know the resulting devastation first-hand and every day someone else dies and another family is added to the casualty list.

In 2020, senior Sheffield coroner David Urpeth ruled that the inquest will investigate issues including the state’s provision of medical treatment to Ritchie and the information available to him and his family about the risks of gambling. The inquest resumes at Sheffield Town Hall on Monday 21 February.

Urpeth said the inquest would include looking at “what is the system of regulation around gambling” and “whether gambling caused or contributed to Jack’s death”.

Jack Ritchie inquest
Jack Ritchie’s family say he began using betting shops when he was underage (family handout/PA)

First Article 2 inquest in relation to gambling

A previous coroner, since retired, ruled in 2019 that the full hearing will be an “Article 2 inquest”. This means it can examine whether any arm of the state breached its duty to protect Ritchie’s right to life.

His family believes it’s the first time an Article 2 inquest has been held in a case relating to gambling.

The coroner has named the following as interested persons:

  • The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).
  • The Department for Health and Social Care.
  • The Gambling Commission.
  • The charity GambleAware
  • And the charity GamCare.

Witnesses from the Gambling Commission, DHSC, GambleAware and GamCare will give evidence to the inquest. And there will be testimony from a range of other experts.

A DCMS spokesperson said:

Our thoughts are with Jack’s family at this difficult time and following this tragic case.

We will not comment further until the inquest and legal proceedings have concluded.

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us