In the 1992 general election, Mike Gapes won the seat of Ilford South for the Labour Party. He’s since retained it six times. And in 2019, he’s running for re-election yet again. His campaign poster has a predictable look to it:

The key elements are what you’d expect. “Re-elect Mike Gapes”, it exhorts. “Real Labour values”, it assures. The red and yellow colour scheme will be familiar to anyone who’s seen previous Labour posters, such as this held by these Ilford South Labour activists:

What’s the catch?
Gapes isn’t Labour. He left the party in February 2019 to form what was initially called The Independent Group. That party has since suffered its own defections, as well as name changes, and now goes by the pithy title of The Independent Group for Change. Eagle-eyed Ilfordians will spot the slightly nondescript TIGfC logo lurking in the bottom right corner of the poster, just above the small print.
Some felt that Gapes’ choice of branding crossed the line from tribute to impersonation:
.@MikeGapes election posters are impersonating #Labour Party branding. Is that allowed when it's clearly deliberate?@UKLabour @IlfordSouthCLP pic.twitter.com/qtasO4eopo
— Mark Townend (@SpeccyTechy) November 14, 2019
https://twitter.com/David__Osland/status/1194622908817010688
Others just couldn’t believe it:
https://twitter.com/KGtto/status/1194909179108102144
Gapes really isn’t Labour
Since an election first began to look likely, the Ilford South Constituency Labour Party (CLP) has made the situation clear with a pinned tweet:
To avoid any confusion, Mike Gapes is no longer a Labour MP. There will be only one Labour candidate on the ballot paper at the next general election in Ilford South, and that will be the candidate that we democratically select over the next six weeks. https://t.co/CkNdsfGAlR
— Ilford South Labour (@IlfordSouthCLP) August 17, 2019
The CLP is now campaigning on behalf of candidate Sam Tarry, whose publicity helpfully uses the latest evolution of Labour’s colour palette:
10,000 leaflets handed out in past 24 hours as part of @IlfordSouthCLP ‘Transport Tuesday’! Proud of the dozens of volunteers helping. We are building a movement from the grassroots up. #RealChange https://t.co/GcFlwuj38C
— Sam Tarry (@SamTarry) November 12, 2019
Gapes has claimed in the past that he doesn’t need a by-election to confirm his popularity with the people of Ilford South:
Because I was elected by my constituents for the seventh time on the basis of my record and my views. And I promised them in my election address that I would be a strong pro European voice in Parliament fighting hard to stay in the Single Market and the Customs Union. And I am https://t.co/zH274x7xaF
— Mike Gapes ⚒🇺🇦🇬🇧 (@MikeGapes) April 28, 2019
But now voters will have the opportunity anyway. And it’ll be a choice between a genuine Labour candidate, standing on the Labour Party’s manifesto, or Gapes. And judging by the way people have seen through his attempt to nick Labour branding, he’ll be in for a tough ride trying to convince people he believes in Labour values.
Featured image via Twitter – Mike Gapes / Wikimedia – The Independent Group for Change








Sheesh! more idiots show their true colours. I suppose that’s a good thing though, for at least they are visibly showing their contempt for our country and people. It’s almost like all the opposition to Jeremy Corbyn secretly want him to win, they just can’t seem to help themselves showing what a bad choice voting for any one else other than J.C’s Labour Party is.
The BBC, Tories, Lib Dems, The Brexit Party, Trump, Netanyahu, Farage, the 25-eyed deep states (the list grows rapidly on a daily basis), seem blindly hell-bent on viewing the majority of mankind as so stupid that we can no longer tell the difference between plain old ‘Good and Bad’………or……..they really want to show themselves up as the dishonest, unworthy people they are in order to ensure Jeremy Corbyn gets in.
It seems to me what we are being offered by these idiots is;
The ‘Devil’ we know, as opposed to the ‘Devil we don’t.
The problem (for them) is that in this case, the real offer is;
The ‘Devil’ we know Vs The near-saint we do.
The choice is a rare one to be sure, but a no-brainer, The near-saint we do know, is by far, a better deal for us than even The Devil we know.