• Donate
  • Login
Sunday, June 7, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

People are reminding Mike Gapes that he’s actually left Labour, because he seems to have forgotten

John Ranson by John Ranson
14 November 2019
in Trending, UK
Reading Time: 2 mins read
172 1
A A
1
Home Trending
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

In the 1992 general election, Mike Gapes won the seat of Ilford South for the Labour Party. He’s since retained it six times. And in 2019, he’s running for re-election yet again. His campaign poster has a predictable look to it:

The key elements are what you’d expect. “Re-elect Mike Gapes”, it exhorts. “Real Labour values”, it assures. The red and yellow colour scheme will be familiar to anyone who’s seen previous Labour posters, such as this held by these Ilford South Labour activists:

What’s the catch?

Gapes isn’t Labour. He left the party in February 2019 to form what was initially called The Independent Group. That party has since suffered its own defections, as well as name changes, and now goes by the pithy title of The Independent Group for Change. Eagle-eyed Ilfordians will spot the slightly nondescript TIGfC logo lurking in the bottom right corner of the poster, just above the small print.

Some felt that Gapes’ choice of branding crossed the line from tribute to impersonation:

.@MikeGapes election posters are impersonating #Labour Party branding. Is that allowed when it's clearly deliberate?@UKLabour @IlfordSouthCLP pic.twitter.com/qtasO4eopo

— Mark Townend (@SpeccyTechy) November 14, 2019

https://twitter.com/David__Osland/status/1194622908817010688

Others just couldn’t believe it:

https://twitter.com/KGtto/status/1194909179108102144

Gapes really isn’t Labour

Since an election first began to look likely, the Ilford South Constituency Labour Party (CLP) has made the situation clear with a pinned tweet:

To avoid any confusion, Mike Gapes is no longer a Labour MP. There will be only one Labour candidate on the ballot paper at the next general election in Ilford South, and that will be the candidate that we democratically select over the next six weeks. https://t.co/CkNdsfGAlR

— Ilford South Labour (@IlfordSouthCLP) August 17, 2019

The CLP is now campaigning on behalf of candidate Sam Tarry, whose publicity helpfully uses the latest evolution of Labour’s colour palette:

10,000 leaflets handed out in past 24 hours as part of @IlfordSouthCLP ‘Transport Tuesday’! Proud of the dozens of volunteers helping. We are building a movement from the grassroots up. #RealChange https://t.co/GcFlwuj38C

— Sam Tarry (@SamTarry) November 12, 2019

Gapes has claimed in the past that he doesn’t need a by-election to confirm his popularity with the people of Ilford South:

Because I was elected by my constituents for the seventh time on the basis of my record and my views. And I promised them in my election address that I would be a strong pro European voice in Parliament fighting hard to stay in the Single Market and the Customs Union. And I am https://t.co/zH274x7xaF

— Mike Gapes ⚒🇺🇦🇬🇧 (@MikeGapes) April 28, 2019

But now voters will have the opportunity anyway. And it’ll be a choice between a genuine Labour candidate, standing on the Labour Party’s manifesto, or Gapes. And judging by the way people have seen through his attempt to nick Labour branding, he’ll be in for a tough ride trying to convince people he believes in Labour values.

Featured image via Twitter – Mike Gapes / Wikimedia – The Independent Group for Change

Tags: Labour Party
Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Labour pledge to close pay gap between men and women by 2030

Next Post

Trans and non-binary election candidates share fears over ‘toxic’ landscape

Next Post
Sophie Cook

Trans and non-binary election candidates share fears over ‘toxic’ landscape

Boris Johnson just got run out of another town

Boris Johnson just got run out of another town

Angela Rayner and Nigel Farage

Angela Rayner only needed one tweet to wipe the floor with Nigel Farage

Cop filming protesters

There's one really simple way you can help protect the freedom to protest

Image of Rachel Riley alongside a tweet criticising her sharing a tweet from a racist minister

The tweet that shows just how cynical Rachel Riley's 'war on antisemitism' has become

Comments 1

  1. Shaolin12 says:
    7 years ago

    Sheesh! more idiots show their true colours. I suppose that’s a good thing though, for at least they are visibly showing their contempt for our country and people. It’s almost like all the opposition to Jeremy Corbyn secretly want him to win, they just can’t seem to help themselves showing what a bad choice voting for any one else other than J.C’s Labour Party is.

    The BBC, Tories, Lib Dems, The Brexit Party, Trump, Netanyahu, Farage, the 25-eyed deep states (the list grows rapidly on a daily basis), seem blindly hell-bent on viewing the majority of mankind as so stupid that we can no longer tell the difference between plain old ‘Good and Bad’………or……..they really want to show themselves up as the dishonest, unworthy people they are in order to ensure Jeremy Corbyn gets in.

    It seems to me what we are being offered by these idiots is;

    The ‘Devil’ we know, as opposed to the ‘Devil we don’t.

    The problem (for them) is that in this case, the real offer is;

    The ‘Devil’ we know Vs The near-saint we do.

    The choice is a rare one to be sure, but a no-brainer, The near-saint we do know, is by far, a better deal for us than even The Devil we know.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Great march for gaza
Skwawkbox

Sectarians fling racist abuse at N Ireland’s charity Great March for Gaza

by Skwawkbox
6 June 2026
World Cup
Global

World Cup — Water bottle ban sparks controversy

by Alaa Shamali
6 June 2026
israel prison
Analysis

Even eyesight is restricted for Palestinian prisoners in Israel’s tortorous prisons

by Ben Marmarelli
6 June 2026
Orientalism
Explainer

Orientalism — What Edward Said can teach us about the US-Israeli war against Iran

by Tchanguize Mahmoodzadeh
6 June 2026
Palestine
Global

Palestine — Ministry of Health in financial crisis because of ‘Israel’

by Charlie Jaay
6 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart