Dr John Lever, a senior lecturer at Huddersfield University, claims that supermarkets only pay ‘lip service’ to animal welfare. He says animal welfare is “unfocused and separate” from the business agenda of global food companies. And he believes that these companies use animal welfare simply for brand awareness and PR.
Supermarkets may not be taking animal suffering seriously. But here’s why they should.
Animal welfare and sustainability
Lever believes that supermarkets are shooting themselves in the foot by ignoring the welfare of animals raised for meat, eggs and dairy. He said:
There is mounting evidence that improvements in farm animal [welfare] can be linked to the three pillars of sustainable development – environment, society and economy.
In a chapter he co-wrote for a new book, Stages of Corporate Responsibility, he argues that big retailers won’t be able to sell as much food if they continue to damage the environment and hinder social and economic development.
A 2014 conference in Italy titled Animal welfare: The Pleasure of Respecting Rights highlighted the central role that animal welfare plays in sustainable development.
Animal welfare doesn’t receive that much attention in sustainability reports. The UN, however, did include animal welfare in its sustainability recommendations. But Lever claims that supermarkets don’t understand this connection between animal welfare and sustainability.
Misleading the public
Supermarkets have form for misleading consumers when it comes to food. For example, Tesco launched a range of products named after farms that don’t exist. Supermarkets also sell meat with misleading labels [paywall] that suggest animals were reared outdoors. But they most likely spent their entire lives confined inside a factory farm. Images of idyllic country scenes with animals roaming free do not match the harsh reality of the situation.
Many big retailers and food companies also like to promote ethical standards through ‘free-range’ and ‘organic’ labels. But this is also somewhat misleading. Free-range eggs do not mean that no animals have suffered. Male chicks, unable to lay eggs and therefore without ‘value’, get gassed or ground to death. This happens with organic and free-range eggs, as well as those from caged battery hens. And under free-range and organic standards, farmers can still dehorn and debeak animals and castrate them without the use of an anaesthetic.
Supermarkets are playing a dangerous game by misleading the public and paying lip service to higher standards. But as Lever notes, they’re not doing themselves any favours. Faking corporate social responsibility means business will suffer. Not just because angry customers might refuse to buy their products in the future. But because a damaged environment will make it a challenge to keep food production going.
Featured image via Pixabay
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop