The Conservative government has made another massive U-turn that reeks of Labour’s plans.
In August, the UK found itself in the odious position of becoming the world’s largest exporter of ivory. And the Conservative Party manifesto for 2017’s general election didn’t mention the ivory trade at all; an industry that is rapidly wiping elephants off the face of the earth.
But now Environment Secretary Michael Gove has announced that the UK will impose a ban on ivory sales. It’s a ban, however, that the Labour Party promised months ago. And the government’s version comes with some details that should be of concern.
Stamp it out
Currently, the UK has a partial ban on ivory. Any ivory younger than 70 years old is illegal. But investigations have shown that the legal ivory trade provides a cover for illegal ivory to reach the market. Because people can manipulate newer ivory to make it look older.
That’s why many see a total ban on ivory as the only solution. But Gove doesn’t use the word “total” in his announcement. Because there will be “exemptions” to it. Exemptions proposed include musical instruments, museum sales and items that only include small amounts of ivory.
Furthermore, the government’s 12-week consultation on the ban will invite input from the antiques sector, among others. Much of the UK’s trade in ivory happens via the antiques industry. And Action for Elephants UK says this industry is the “chief obstacle” to a total ban.
Nonetheless, Gove’s announcement is a step in the right direction. A 2016 study counted only 352,271 African savannah elephants left across 15 countries. Poachers kill one of these majestic creatures every 15 minutes. Time is of the absolute essence.
So we owe it to the remaining elephants and our own reputation to move on this ban as quickly as possible.
– Help save elephants with Action For Elephants UK.
– Add your voice to the consultation.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?