As many people sat watching BBC Question Time on Thursday 5 October, a series of positive by-election results just kept on coming for the Labour Party; including gaining two seats from the right.
Holding out for a hero
On a night when eight council elections were happening, Labour held two of its seats. Mike Pevitt won Claremont in Salford with 718 votes, but the result was marred by a turnout of just 18.53%, meaning just 8.6% of the public voted for Pevitt.
Meanwhile, in the Crewe East ward of Cheshire East, Joy Bratherton [pdf] won for Labour, holding the seat for the party. But this result was no less interesting, as Labour increased its vote share by 14.8%, almost exactly the same amount UKIP’s fell by.
Over to the Conservatives, who managed to hold three seats they were contesting in Stoneleigh & Cubbington (Warwick); Burnham Lent Rise and Taplow (South Buckinghamshire); and Burbage Sketchley & Stretton (Hinckley and Bosworth). And the Lib Dems held their seat in St Germain, Redcar.
But it was Labour’s gains which will bring most heart to Jeremy Corbyn. His party stole Borehamwood Kenilworth in Hertsmere from the Conservatives after their candidate stood down in September. But the result was not as clear as it seems: Labour’s vote share was down 9.1%. And the party only won because the Conservatives dropped further, by 19.4%.
The sweetest Labour victory was in Mash Barn, Worthing. Labour took the seat from UKIP, increasing its vote share by 29.7%. This is the first time Labour has won the seat in 20 years, with the party third in the last election. And it happened shortly after Mash Barn had a visit from a certain Mr Corbyn.
With Theresa May floundering nationally and Labour still ahead in the Westminster polls, the tide at local level appears to be turning in Corbyn’s favour too.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?