The government has revealed that a childhood crisis it thought was under control is actually getting much worse [IMAGES]

Theresa May Tories Childhood Cost
Steve Topple

Analysis released on 11 October claimed a crisis with young children in the UK was “plateauing” (not changing). But new figures have revealed that this is not the case at all. And if anything, this serious issue is rapidly getting worse.

Plateauing?

As The Canary previously reported, analysis from Imperial College London (ICL) published in The Lancet showed childhood obesity levels are increasing worldwide. But the data from ICL appeared to show that childhood obesity is “plateauing” in the UK. At the time, The Canary noted that:

this masks the true reality of the situation. And it’s one where levels of obesity among the poorest children are spiralling out of control.

And now, the latest figures from NHS Digital prove this analysis in England.

Obesity, meet poverty

The National Child Measurement Programme has just published its findings for 2016/17 [pdf]. It found that, overall, obesity levels in year six children remained stable, but those for reception age children continued to rise, year-on-year. But digging deeper into the NHS analysis just compounds The Canary‘s previous assertion about the links between obesity and poverty.

NHS Digital found that children living in the most deprived areas of England were more than twice as likely to be obese compared to their richest peers. Both at reception age:

ObesityOne

And at year six, but with the poor/rich gap much larger:

Obesity Two

And over time, the gap between the most and least deprived children has steadily widened:

Obesity Three

At both stages, obesity prevalence is higher [pdf, p16-17] in boys than in girls. It is also worse in disadvantaged urban areas and multicultural city locations than anywhere else [pdf, p19]. And aside from obesity, the report noted that [pdf, p13]:

In general underweight prevalence decreases as deprivation decreases

London had [pdf, p11] the most underweight children at reception age.

But the obvious class divide in childhood weight is replicated in nearly every other public health crisis.

Entrenched inequality

The same pattern can be seen in adult obesity [pdf, p11]:

adult obesity

In smoking statistics [pdf, p10]:

Smoking rates

And also in alcohol-related deaths:

Alcohol deaths

And alcohol-related A&E admissions [pdf, p19]:

Alcohol admissions

As with every public health emergency, the issue of childhood obesity is not one of ‘sugar taxes’, the state acting as a ‘nanny’, or regulation; it is one of classism and rampant inequality across all areas of life.

The real crisis: classism

With the clear link between poverty, inequality, and children’s weight, it would seem like a good idea for the government to tackle England’s deprivation problem. But instead, it has imposed measures like the two-child limit on tax credits. A policy which will affect hundreds of thousands of working families, and push an estimated 200,000 more children into poverty.

It is far easier for the government to tax soft drinks than to tackle the real cause of public health emergencies: classist inequality. This is sadly a reality that is not only rampant in society, but entrenched in the mindset of the party that’s in government.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Flickr/YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed