Since 2010, NHS A&E services have been required to see 95% of patients within a four-hour window. NHS England has now scrapped this target until April 2019. And it makes Jeremy Hunt’s management of the NHS look increasingly weak.
A major change to A&E services
An NHS England document states:
Contract sanctions for performance standards are currently suspended. We propose to extend this until April 2019.
But the fact that NHS England is now throwing in the towel and admitting it cannot be achieved is particularly damning.
This is the first time we have had to accept that the NHS will not meet its key constitutional standards.
The NHS will not be able to improve performance against those targets. If we want to provide quality of care, we need the right long-term financial settlement.
Hunt’s promises for improved care
The Health Secretary recently revealed plans to eliminate cases of suicide in NHS mental health trusts. As The Canary reported, this is known as a ‘Zero Suicide’ policy. The Samaritans has said this pledge is commendable. But many people experiencing a mental health crisis rely on A&E services. As such, long waiting times can be fatal.
Of course, the scrapping of the four-hour waiting target will affect everyone who relies on A&E services. Hunt has tried to deny a crisis in the NHS. But since he has been Health Secretary, many hospitals have been forced to close their walk-in centres and cancel operations.
This latest change to A&E services is further evidence of Hunt’s failings as Health Secretary. Hunt has made promises to eliminate suicide and add more nurses to the workforce. This will be difficult to achieve with further austerity cuts. And that’s why the chronic underfunding of the NHS has to stop.
– Read more articles from The Canary on the NHS.
– Join us, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?