The most severely injured survivor of the 7/7 bombings has slammed the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) after they interrogated him for ‘proof’ that he is disabled. This is the latest example of prejudice against the disabled, a problem that’s already familiar to the DWP.
Daniel Biddle, who lost both legs, an eye and his spleen in the 2005 attacks, suffers from post-traumatic stress and is now being asked to answer intrusive questions about the extent of disability. He may even be forced to undergo a face-to-face test if he wants to keep receiving his Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) of £416 per month.
This damning news appears to provide more proof that discrimination against the disabled is rife within the DWP, an organisation that dictates the freedoms of disabled people every day. Here is a roll call of some of the DWP’s most widely publicised recent controversies:
- Earlier this month, the DWP came under fire after a survey revealed that workplace discrimination, harassment and bullying is rife against disabled members of its own staff.
- As The Canary reported on 4th February, nearly 14,000 disabled people had had their mobility cars confiscated after a change to benefit assessments.
- In January, the bedroom tax (imposed by the DWP) was twice declared unlawful and discriminatory due to its impact on extremely vulnerable individuals (dealing a damaging blow to work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith, the policy’s author).
- In January, a High Court ruled that the benefits cap discriminates unfairly against the carers of disabled people.
Under the Tories, the UK has become the first country in the world to be investigated by the UN for violating the rights of disabled people. It’s time that the DWP was subjected to drastic reform or shut down and replaced altogether by a more ethical organisation.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?