Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has refused to set up a free telephone number for millions of the UK’s poorest people, despite a previous pledge to do so. Those who will soon be applying for his new Universal Credit benefit will be charged for inquiries. This can be added to his long list of failures.
The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) has overseen a number of draconian policies. These policies include:
- The construction of the work capability assessment (WCA), which has been linked to causing 590 suicides and 279,000 cases of mental illness.
- The ‘bedroom tax’ which has disproportionately affected disabled people. Thousands of disabled people have been subjected to the bedroom tax, with some being forced to move into smaller, unsuitable houses where, among other inadequacies, they have no choice but to wash in a paddling pool.
- Also, nearly 14,000 disabled people have had their mobility cars confiscated after a change in benefit assessment.
- Depressingly, the DWP has been accused by the most severely injured survivor of the 7/7 bombings, of interrogating him over ‘proof’ that he is disabled.
- All of these measures are designed to save money. Staggeringly, benefit cuts have saved no net amount of money at all.
And now, the introduction of the Universal Credit will punish those who need help by charging them for ringing to make claims under his new system.
The Universal Credit is designed to be an all-inclusive welfare payment. It will combine jobseeker’s allowance, income support, housing benefit, child benefit, working tax, and child tax credits, making them all one payment. However, there are a number of drawbacks to this new system. One of the main problems is the costs to those applying for the benefit.
Previously, the DWP pledged free calls for “all major benefit claim lines”, as the Daily Mirror points out. But Iain Duncan Smith has refused to set up a freephone line. This means that calls can cost up to 45p per minute. If you want to apply over the phone, this can take up to 40 minutes, meaning the application could cost up to £18.
For people on the lowest income, this could be the difference between affording food or missing out, being able to travel to work or not, or being able to heat the house or not.
Despite the DWP, under Iain Duncan Smith, claiming it wants to save money, it has spent an extortionate amount of money on a cartoon character which cost £8.5 million. He was supposedly designed to promote the rights of workers to workplace pensions in TV adverts. But how far could £8.5million go towards supporting families?
Also, Iain Duncan Smith is going to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds in public money trying to overturn a recent court ruling it would cost less to implement. The ruling was that an exemption clause in the bedroom tax must be extended to all abuse victims. The appeal in the Supreme Court will go ahead, despite its likely cost to taxpayers being higher than it would be just to enact the exemption.
This shows the government’s desire to punish the poor in any way they can. The government will waste money challenging court rulings designed to protect individuals within the UK, as well as spending millions on expensive characters for TV adverts. But following through on a pledge to provide free phone lines to the poorest people seeking to make a claim? All of a sudden this government can’t do that.
Support The Canary so we can keep the pressure on this government
Lend support to UCATT or other organisations fighting against the bedroom tax
Contact your local MP to pressurise them to speak out against the DWP’s policies
Featured image via Wikimedia.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?