The travesty of how Olympic women’s bodies are being ‘covered’

Support us and go ad-free

Corners of the British press are infamous for their exploitation of women’s bodies to sell papers, and more recently for a trend of Islamophobic slants in their coverage. But in their coverage of women’s beach volleyball at the 2016 Rio Olympics, they’ve found perfect ground to do both.

The volleyball match between Egypt and Germany was well documented, and news reports were largely identical. Focus was on the differences in dress of the women’s teams, and how ‘starkly divided’ this proved Western and Islamic cultures to be.

According to The Daily Mail, the “massive cultural divide” between the West and Islam was highlighted in the match. The Sun saw that same “cultural divide”, but called it “colossal“. And The Daily Express made the focus of their story, diverted from the sport itself, even more blatant by leading with the headline, “a tale of two kits“.

All the papers picked up on the fact that Egypt’s Doaa Elghobashy chose to wear a hijab and her teammate Nada Meawad did not, and that uniform regulations had been relaxed ahead of London 2012 in order to be more “culturally sensitive“. The 2012 change added shorts, leggings and both short and long sleeved tops to the choices of uniform.

The 2004 regulations had previously stated that playing in “warm up sportswear” was permitted in cold weather.

Less commentary was given to the fact that the choices and pressures for secular, Western, or any other female Olympic athletes surrounding their appearance are equally as present as those for Muslim women. Not only due to the regulations for how small their bikinis needed to be, but also in the way that those same papers choose to report their matches.

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/763075094247796736

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The Daily Mail felt it necessary to note that “some fans” were “left disappointed” after a match during cold weather had led some Western teams to wear longer sleeves and leggings. The game between the US and Swiss teams “didn’t look quite right”, apparently, as “there was less skin on show”. Luckily for those viewers, though, the US team “kept their bikini bottoms on show”.

In 2012, The Huffington Post reported that British volleyball player Denise Johns believed women’s attire to be a tactic by the Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB):

The people who own the sport [the Fédération Internationale de Volleyball] want it to be sexy…

I used to play in shorts and a T-shirt and was reluctant to change. But if it gets volleyball attention, so be it.

And in the same article, US volleyball player Kerri Walsh was quoted defending the kit as “functional“:

We need to be wearing bikinis. You don’t want to be wearing baggy clothes and be lost in your clothes

All female Olympic volleyball players now have a greater choice of kit style, within particular regulations, and notably within hefty branding and sponsorship regulations too. As a result, their choices in attire should cease to be a problem, if they ever were one.

The truly “colossal” cultural divide, meanwhile, is between the coverage given to male and female sportspeople in 2016, and the use of women’s cultural backgrounds as a distraction from their sporting achievements.

Get Involved!

– See other Canary articles about the Olympics.

– Campaign for better media coverage with the Media Reform Coalition.

Support The Canary‘s independent journalism.

Image via Brazil Women’s Beach Volleyball Team

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed