Donald Trump has won the US Presidency without actually winning the majority of votes. This is because the American system works on an electoral college format, which means the country’s fate really lies in the hands of just 538 people.
Trump’s majority of 276 electoral colleges over Hillary Clinton’s 218 did not raise any doubt. He was definitely the 45th President of the United States. But to say that most Americans voted for him is not quite true.
The electoral college
Statistically, Clinton won more of the popular vote than her opponent. She gained 47.6% of total American votes, while Trump received 47.5%. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson took 3.2%, and Jill Stein just 1%.
In short, over half of the American population is unrepresented by Trump, and will live under policies they didn’t vote for.
This is all possible because, when people vote, they don’t actually vote for a President. They vote for an ‘elector’. And the number of electors in any state depends on its population. In total, there are 538 electors made up of 435 Congress members, 100 Senators, and three more electors in the District of Columbia.
In theory, these 538 members can choose who they like as president. In reality, they tend to choose the person who wins the majority of the votes statewide. And most states have laws to ensure this. But if an elector really wanted to hijack an election, they could (and just pay the resulting fine). Once a President wins in 270 electoral colleges, they win the election.
The system’s aim is to ensure regional balance, so that smaller states’ concerns do not get drowned out by larger ones.
But we could say the opposite is true. Very small states tend to be over-represented, because the minimum number of votes any of them get is three.
So the fact that Trump won with fewer votes than another candidate is not a surprise. And it’s happened before. The 2000 election between Al Gore and George W Bush is the last example. Gore won by popular majority, but Bush scored big on elector votes.
For more, see this video:
An outdated system?
The system came into place in 1787, before the establishment of political parties. So instead of voting for a party, voters selected an elector. Now, the political parties choose the electors, which would appear to be a conflict of interest. What’s worse is that many Americans don’t even know this. And the constitution doesn’t protect their individual vote; it only protects the vote of those 538 electors.
Some people also argue that abolishing the system wouldn’t put regional balance at risk. This is because the country’s demographics mean there has to be some support outside the big states for a candidate to win overall.
There is hunger for change, and 11 states have enacted the National Popular Vote bill. But that won’t change the reality of what was probably one of the most controversial elections ever.
Featured image via Flickr/KAZ Vorpal
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?