A Twitter feed highlights everything wrong with Trump’s travel ban

Support us and go ad-free

Thousands have joined protests against Trump’s travel ban. Trump’s executive order bans entry from seven Muslim-majority countries – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen – for 90 days. And it shuts down refugee entry for 120 days. A Twitter feed brings into focus the callousness of this crackdown on refugees.

Fleeing persecution

@Stl_Manifest remembers the victims of Nazism who the US refused entry in 1939. On International Holocaust Memorial Day, this account tweeted the individual stories of hundreds of Jewish refugees who were fleeing Nazi persecution. Such as Regina Blumenstein, who was later murdered at Auschwitz, as was a young boy named Joachim Hirsch.

The St. Louis ship set sail from Hamburg to Cuba on 13 May 1939. It carried 939 passengers. Cuba, the US and Canada denied them entry, but various European countries then allowed many of them to enter. Historians estimate that around a quarter of these refugees died in death camps during WWII. Author Gordon Thomas detailed the event in his book Voyage of the Damned (1974).

Now, the US will be denying shelter to those Muslim refugees fleeing persecution, violence, terror, subjugation, and extreme poverty in war-torn countries.

Cruel and unnecessary

The US has suspended the Syrian refugee programme indefinitely. In 2016, the US accepted 12,486 Syrian refugees. Germany took in 300,000, Turkey 2.7 million, and Lebanon 1 million. The US has gone from failing to do its fair share to doing nothing at all.

Aspects of the ban seem to be more about culture than security. During the 120-day refugee ban, the US will still accept refugees under two circumstances. It will honour its pre-existing international agreement to resettle refugees currently detained in Nauru. The US also welcomes “religious minorities” whose governments are persecuting them. This allows the White House to prioritise Christians from the Middle East (such as those persecuted in Syria) over Muslims. Leaders of nearly every Christian denomination have objected to this preferential treatment.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer says that Trump’s refugee ban is about ensuring the security and safety of the American people. It’s part of Trump’s narrative of ‘America First’. But if we examine the evidence, Trump’s executive order looks totally unnecessary.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Findings show that terrorism by self-proclaimed Muslims makes up only one-third of 1% of all murders in the US. In 2015, toddlers killed more people than terrorists. Cows, lightning, falling out of bed, and a financial crash are also more likely to kill a US citizen than a jihadi extremist.

Data underscores that, since 9/11, not one person from the seven countries targeted by Trump has killed a US citizen in a terrorist attack. So it is unlikely that this extreme measure will have any impact on preventing or reducing the very minor threat of terrorism in the US.

Also, experts believe the ban could actually heighten the risk of terrorism. In reality, the ban is (poorly) disguised xenophobia.

The people fight back

People all over the world are reacting to Trump’s xenophobia. Over 1 million people have signed a petition calling for Trump’s state visit to the UK to be cancelled. And thousands are set to protest tonight in London against Trump’s controversial border crackdown. Journalist Owen Jones, who set up the protest, said:

Future generations will look back at the targeting of Muslims – as we look back at the targeting of Jews – with disgust, horror and shame. If we do not speak out, we are complicit.

Trump marked Holocaust Memorial Day with a pledge that evil would “never again defeat the powers of good”. Yet his travel ban immediately breaks this promise. We can’t let history repeat itself.

Get Involved!

Join protests taking place across the UK tonight.

– See more TrumpWatch articles at The Canary Global.

– Visit our Facebook and Twitter pages for more independent international coverage.

Featured image via Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed