On Thursday 16 March, an airstrike on a mosque in Syria’s Aleppo province reportedly killed at least 42 civilians. But contrary to early reports, it was not a Russian or Syrian government attack. It was carried out by the US-led coalition.
US military chiefs claim the attack was targeting al-Qaeda rebels in nearby Idlib province. But at around 7pm-7.30pm local time, bombs fell about 50ft from the mosque in al-Jina, which was packed with 300 people observing evening prayers.
Major Josh Jacques told Airwars that its target in al-Jina was ‘assessed to be a meeting place for al-Qaeda, and we took the strike – it happened to be across the street from where there is a mosque’.
US Central Command, meanwhile, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) that “US forces conducted an air strike” on al-Qaeda, “killing several terrorists”. And it said it would “look into any allegations of civilian casualties”.
It also said that the geolocation of the strike had been confirmed to the al-Jina area.
— Christiaan Triebert (@trbrtc) March 17, 2017
Abu Muhammed, a village resident, told AFP that he:
heard powerful explosions when the mosque was hit. It was right after prayers at a time when there are usually religious lessons for men in it. I saw 15 bodies and lots of body parts in the debris when I arrived. We couldn’t even recognise some of the bodies…
In January, the US was forced to admit the US-led coalition had killed at least 188 civilians so far in its Syrian and Iraqi bombing campaigns. And with this latest atrocity, the question of the West’s strategy in the Middle East has been brought sharply back into focus.
Featured image via Twitter screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?