Bungled British military interventions in Libya and operations by British intelligence services may have contributed to the 22 May Manchester bombing. And both MI6 and MI5 need to take some of the blame for what happened.
Chaotic foreign policy
Under former Prime Minister Tony Blair, British foreign policy regarding Libya was generally supportive of the regime of Muammar Gaddafi. Ostensibly, this was all about getting an agreement by the Libyan president to give up chemical weapons. But oil was inevitably another factor.
But this rapprochement perhaps went too far. Indeed, it has been shown that MI6 played a pivotal role [pdf] in the alleged rendition of rebel leader Abdel Hakim Belhaj, who was subsequently tortured by Libyan intelligence. And several documents [pdf] showed the extent to which MI6 head Sir Mark Allen personally intervened in the matter.
In 2002, former MI6 agent and whistleblower David Shayler accused the British spy agency of colluding with the jihadist group in a failed 1996 effort to kill Gaddafi, an allegation the British government strenuously denies.
Change of tack
Then, under former Prime Minister David Cameron, British foreign policy changed direction. And UK, French and US military intervention saw the fall of Gaddafi.
The LIFG renounced violence in 2006. And it eventually went on to help form the Libyan Islamic Movement for Change (LIMC), which would gain prominence after the overthrow of Gaddafi. The Manchester bomber was allegedly affiliated to the remnants of the LIFG’s most radical elements.
MI5 played its part too
Now there are claims that, at one stage, MI5 allowed LIFG militants to travel back and forth to Libya. This is described as having been an ‘open door’ policy, allowing jihadis free rein to fight against Gaddafi in the 2011 uprising.
Of course, MI5 would not take such action without explicit authorisation from the Home Office, which was then headed by Theresa May.
Libyans living in Manchester claim they advised the UK authorities about terrorists living in their community. But nothing was done about it.
Britain now needs to be having a number of big conversations. But in particular, we need a sensible foreign policy based on long-term outcomes – rather than short-term political gains – in order to achieve peace. Under the current government, that appears unlikely.
– Those who are concerned about loved ones or anyone who may have been in the area at the time of the attack can call this emergency number: 0800 096 0095.
– For more coverage on the attack, see here.
Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?