US President Donald Trump gave his first speech to the UN General Assembly (UNGA) on 19 September 2017. He made frequent references to ‘world peace’, and was critical of many countries and regimes around the world. But it was what he didn’t say, and the countries that he didn’t attack, that was most revealing – and worrying.
The ‘strongest military ever’
Trump bragged that the US “will be spending almost $700bn on our military and defence”; and that “our military will soon be the strongest it has ever been”. He also praised America’s supposed history of not trying to “impose our way of life on others”. And he claimed the US is “guided by outcomes, not ideologies”.
The UNGA is assembled from all 193 members. And it is the only UN organ where each member nation has a vote. Speaking to representatives from these countries, Trump mentioned ‘sovereignty’ (a state’s authority to govern itself) on numerous occasions. But as he continued, it became increasingly clear that he was not referring to all UN member states.
Trump spoke, for example, of “small regimes” that the “righteous” needed to “confront”. And the list of US ‘enemies’ began to flow. And despite his references to respecting the sovereignty of other nations, he went on to make threats and call for regime changes around the world.
The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea.
While the issue of sanctions for North Korea is far from simple, and there was no mention of the billions of dollars the US will make selling weapons to South Korea, the threat of ‘total destruction’ is unlikely to help anyone.
The US President then turned his attentions to Iran, calling it a “murderous regime” which “masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy”.
But not because of democracy or human rights. Instead, his hostility is largely because Iran’s regional enemies, Saudi Arabia and Israel, are US allies; because there’s a barely reported conflict occurring over oil pipelines in the Middle East; and because Iran does not bend easily to America’s will.
Although both Iran and Saudi Arabia have equally poor human rights records, for example, Trump made no criticism at all of Saudi Arabia. In fact, he claimed that Iran had “fuel[ed] Yemen’s civil war”, while completely ignoring Saudi Arabia’s key role – and alleged war crimes – in the Yemeni conflict.
Nor did Trump mention the ongoing atrocities committed by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. So it comes as no surprise that, since Trump’s speech, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said:
In over 30 years in my experience with the UN, I never heard a bolder or more courageous speech.
Trump also criticised Iran for ‘restricting internet access’, ‘shooting unarmed student protesters’, and ‘imprisoning political reformers’. But there was no mention of US allies like Turkey which have reportedly committed the same abuses.
Guided by outcomes, not ideologies? Really?
He also called Venezuela’s democratically elected government a “socialist dictatorship”, saying its people were “starving”. But while trying to score political points over Venezuela – an oil-rich nation which the US has long sought to manipulate by pushing large amounts of money into opposition hands, Trump essentially ignored the widespread famine across Africa that is also deeply rooted in political issues; a crisis that now threatens over 20 million people and which Oxfam has called the “largest hunger emergency in the world”.
Trump then went on to say:
From the Soviet Union to Cuba to Venezuela, wherever true socialism or communism has been adopted, it has delivered anguish and devastation and failure.
Apart from his inaccurate comparison of socialism and ‘communism’, Trump also failed to mention China; a nominally communist country which some forecast will overtake the US as the world’s biggest economy in the coming years. Perhaps Trump’s silence had something to do with his recent trade deal with Beijing?
A dangerous rant, not a speech…
Trump’s UN rant about the countries he didn’t like wasn’t surprising. But it was what he didn’t say that was most revealing – and dangerous. For example, there was no mention of:
- The alleged ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma (Myanmar), which has forced 400,000 refugees to flee the country in recent weeks.
- The fact that US authorities have reportedly killed around 100 civilians a month so far in 2017.
- The alleged war crimes in Yemen of the Saudi Arabian dictatorship (a Western ally heavily linked to terrorism).
- The alleged war crimes in both Turkey and Syria of the increasingly authoritarian Turkish regime of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (and its alleged links to terrorism).
- The fact that US ally Honduras (where US officials allegedly helped to install a pro-US regime through a 2009 coup) has one of the highest murder rates in the world.
- The dismal human rights record of Western ally Mexico, including the forced ‘disappearance’ of 43 student teachers in 2014; the murder of thousands of women every year; frequent accusations of rigged elections [Spanish]; and being one the most difficult and dangerous places in the world to be a journalist.
Essentially, Trump revealed in his speech a belief in the sovereignty of countries that are US allies; and a belief in regime change in countries that are not US allies. He also showed that he is perfectly happy to exploit human rights abuses for his own political benefit, as long as it’s not America’s friends committing those abuses. It was not a speech about peace or human rights. It was Trump laying out his hypocritically aggressive politics for the whole world to see.
Featured image via Facebook
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?