On 19 September, Donald Trump threatened “to totally destroy North Korea”. But just a day later, it was the neglected US territory of Puerto Rico which would be “destroyed“, as Hurricane Maria made landfall. The storm – reportedly the island’s strongest in over 80 years – plunged 3.4 million inhabitants into darkness and killed at least 13 people.
But the story is about much more than a horrific natural disaster. It’s about how such disasters can wreak particular havoc on countries that are already suffering. And it’s about how the US should focus as much effort on protecting territories it’s responsible for as it does on lecturing and threatening territories it’s not responsible for.
From bad to worse: “financial crisis”, “environmental tragedy”, and US neglect
According to Puerto Rico’s Governor Ricardo Rossello, the damage that Maria caused to the island’s electricity grid meant that restoring power could take months.
New Republic writer Emily Atkin, meanwhile, wrote recently about how Maria was going to make an already existent “environmental tragedy” in Puerto Rico “even worse”. Part of this, she explained, was down to the US territory’s “extensive financial crisis”. And she described “situations that, frankly, we would not accept.. in the mainland United States” – including landfill sites “overflowing with liquid garbage” and piles of coal ash up to five storeys high – which would only be made worse by the hurricane.
On 22 September, meanwhile, authorities issued an evacuation order to tens of thousands of people on the island after damage to a dam meant it could collapse at any moment.
How did a US territory get to this point?
Territories like Puerto Rico ‘belong to‘ the US, and the latter ‘makes the rules’. People can vote in US primaries, but not in presidential elections. Also, as Slate described in June, another quirk of Puerto Rico’s status is that:
Although Puerto Ricans fully pay into the U.S. Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security systems, they cannot collect the same benefits as citizens in the 50 states, which shifts more of their health care costs onto the territory’s government.
And that’s not all. As Slate pointed out:
After 10 years of recession, Puerto Rico’s unemployment rate is at 11.5 percent, and the territory owes $74 billion in debt.
Puerto Rico is a strategic foothold for the US in the Caribbean. And some people blame the island’s economic problems in part on what they call its “colonial status”. Puerto Rico has a long and turbulent history of fighting for independence from the US. And as The Huffington Post‘s wrote in 2016:
Since the U.S. invasion of Puerto Rico in 1898, Washington’s relationship with Puerto Rico has been one of exploitation and convenience. From the Ponce Massacre and government-sanctioned programs aimed at forcibly sterilizing working class Puerto Rican women to unethical testing and human radiation experiments on Puerto Rican prisoners, the U.S. government has a shameful track record of transgressions on the island.
Trump – stop the point-scoring and focus on Puerto Rico
When the US first occupied Puerto Rico, it also occupied Cuba. But the Cuban Revolution in 1959 fundamentally changed the dynamics of US-Cuban relations. To punish the country, a US embargo soon followed and, in 2014, Cuban officials argued that these sanctions had cost the island $116.8bn. Although Barack Obama began to change the US stance on Cuba towards the end of his presidency, Donald Trump has pulled this policy into reverse. And Trump’s recent speech at the UN made Washington’s renewed hostility towards Cuba clear.
But instead of scoring political points against Cuba and other countries, it’s the devastation of Puerto Rico – and the tragedy that has long been unfolding on the island – that should be Trump’s focus as US President. Rather than looking into other countries’ backyards, he’d be much better off sorting out his own backyard first.
Featured image via screenshot
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?