By 10am on 15 May, Israeli snipers had killed 59 Palestinians and shot more than 2,200. Perched atop the apartheid wall which Israel built around Gaza (imprisoning its 1.9 million inhabitants), the snipers fired into crowds indiscriminately. But the BBC did not report this as a massacre. This decision should shame the BBC for as long as it exists.
Behind the wall
Gaza residents live behind a giant apartheid wall. Israel built the wall, and Israeli armed forces guard it. I’ve been through the Erez Crossing into Gaza several times, most recently in 2014 when I travelled to cover Israel’s bloody Operation Protective Edge. It’s not a border fence. It’s the entrance to a maximum security prison. And Israel decides who enters and leaves.
On 14 May, Palestinians marched towards the wall, as if marching home from their decades of exile in Gaza. It’s now 70 years since Israeli militia ethnically cleansed the area of much of its Muslim population. As Al Jazeera reports:
Between 1947 and 1949, at least 750,000 Palestinians from a 1.9 million population were made refugees beyond the borders of the state. Zionist forces had taken more than 78 percent of historic Palestine, ethnically cleansed and destroyed about 530 villages and cities, and killed about 15,000 Palestinians in a series of mass atrocities, including more than 70 massacres.
Many of the Palestinians forced from their homes in 1948 ended up in Gaza and the West Bank. And since then, Israel has continued to step up its occupation. Israel’s apartheid wall doesn’t just surround Gaza, it separates village from village across the West Bank. It creates complete Israeli control of both areas, and makes talk of a two-state solution a fool’s promise. There is no Palestine today, there is no border. There is only Israel, and populations of Palestinian people collectively imprisoned behind the apartheid wall.
Israeli snipers opened fire on the Gaza marchers. With nowhere to run, casualties and fatalities were certain. Those killed included women, children, elderly people, and journalists. As Amnesty International commented in a statement condemning the massacre:
Early medical reports from Gaza today indicate that dozens of people have been shot in the head or chest. Amnesty International last month documented research from the Gaza Strip that showed the Israeli military were killing and maiming demonstrators who pose no imminent threat to them.
The scenes bring to mind apartheid South Africa’s 1960 Sharpeville massacre, in which white police massacred dozens of black protesters. And the cover story is similar too.
Photos taken today in Gaza, East of the al-Bureij refugee camp, by our field researcher, Khaled al-'Azayzeh
Firing live ammunition at Gaza demonstrators shows appalling indifference to human life on the part of senior Israeli government and military: https://t.co/eUxcMU3CZt pic.twitter.com/UDNEwLWYsL
— B'Tselem בצלם بتسيلم (@btselem) May 14, 2018
— Razan 🇵🇸 (@razan_palestine) May 14, 2018
(Pictures taken at the same time this afternoon) pic.twitter.com/0ySzaGjQC9
— Patrick Galey🦖 (@patrickgaley) May 14, 2018
Enter the BBC
The BBC and other Western media outlets dutifully regurgitated Israeli propaganda. They wrote of “clashes” at the “border”. They made it sound as if Palestinians had invaded Israel, and that Israel was merely defending itself from the siege. No mention of the wall, or the decade-long Israeli blockade which has created a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. And no mention of international law. Because Israel is occupying Palestinian land illegally.
Israel does not have the right to ‘self-defence’ as the agitator and occupier. But the Palestinian people do have a right to armed resistance in response to illegal occupation.
None of this made it into the BBC‘s reports. Media Lens kept a sharp eye on the BBC as the protesters were slain, pointing out the misleading nature of its coverage.
— Media Lens (@medialens) May 14, 2018
Today, @BBCNews has utterly disgraced itself over the massacre of 55 Palestinians by Israeli forces. Headline after headline on the top page of its website has masked the truth. And now it leads with 'Israel defends…' What an abomination. pic.twitter.com/Ap42WA7bGh
— Media Lens (@medialens) May 14, 2018
BBC headline from 15/05/2018.
Like they're suggesting it's the protesters who are instigating violence, rather than the occupying forces shooting them in the back and in the head: pic.twitter.com/WBGRdWDf7a
— TheCleverMonikerHaver (@ElwinWay) May 15, 2018
It wasn’t just the BBC.
Today's Guardian front page headline: ‘Israel: Trump’s new embassy opens – and dozens are killed’
The Independent's version: 'In Jerusalem, an embassy opens. In Gaza, at least 58 die on bloodiest day in years'
What a mindless, heartless herd they arehttps://t.co/farWq10yqq
— Media Lens (@medialens) May 15, 2018
this one's got it all:
"death toll rises" — no one was killed and no one specific party did the killing, the death toll just mysteriously "rises"
"clashes" — launders all power asymmetry
"2,400 people have been injured" — all 2,400 are Palestinian but lets go with "people" https://t.co/7mUy6xSXIY
— Adam H. Johnson (@adamjohnsonNYC) May 14, 2018
A victory for real media
But opponents of Israel’s illegal occupation won a key victory against this deception. In response to public pressure, the New York Times actually changed its headline.
It’s time to demand the same of the BBC.
– Let the BBC know your thoughts.
– Join and support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. This is a non-violent means of resisting Israel’s occupation.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets:
Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?