Another minister has given ‘misleading’ information. What the hell is going on at the Home Office?

Amber Rudd, Theresa May, and Caroline Nokes
John Shafthauer

The Home Office has been in the news for all the wrong reasons recently. The Windrush scandal has focused on two former home secretaries – Amber Rudd and Theresa May. But the problems with that department appear to be widespread. And now, the immigration minister has been accused of “shambolic incompetence”.

The pattern emerging makes it increasingly difficult to believe it’s all just “incompetence”, though.

Caroline Nokes

Caroline Nokes became the immigration minister in 2018. She was previously responsible for ‘government efficiency‘ at the notoriously “incompetent” Department for Work and Pensions.

Nokes was recently in the news regarding immigration policy. The government is revoking [paywall] the visas of many immigrants following claims they’ve cheated in the Test of English for International Communication. Many who are affected claim they were incorrectly identified, yet they cannot appeal until after they’ve left the UK.

In response to this, Nokes said “the government has no plans to change the appeals system”. Sabtir Singh, the chief executive of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said [paywall]:

This is yet another astonishing example of how complacency and hostility in our immigration system ruins lives on a daily basis without any accountability

And now, Nokes is making headlines again.

“Shambolic incompetence”

A Guardian investigation revealed that 1,000 highly skilled migrants were incorrectly facing deportation. Speaking to the home affairs select committee, Nokes claimed she hadn’t yet looked into this issue because:

there have been only two working days since this issue was flagged up.

The Guardian has now gained access to letters written by Nokes from February 2018. It reported:

In both of her detailed replies, Nokes demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the issue and the individual cases, stating that while she is unable to comment on particular instances, “I can set out in general terms how my officials consider these types of application”.

The chair of the committee, Yvette Cooper, said it:

has been given inaccurate information too many times already…

The Home Office cannot keep providing inaccurate or incomplete information to parliament.

Suspended Labour MP and committee member John Woodcock accused the Home Office of “shambolic incompetence”. But this is far from the only time the country has been asked to decide if the department is “shambolic” or wilfully deceptive.


Amber Rudd resigned as the home secretary on Sunday 29 April. By the time she left, she had made statements which were at the very least ‘misleading‘. The final straw came when Rudd claimed to have been unaware of targets, and was later revealed to have been the recipient of a memo setting out targets.

Theresa May was the architect of the ‘hostile environment’ policy that caused the Windrush scandal. May unsuccessfully tried switching the blame for this to Labour, and was promptly accused of misleading Parliament.

May’s ex chief of staff Nick Timothy also waded into the situation, and tried to claim May didn’t know about the famously racist ‘go-home’ vans. It was quickly shown this wasn’t true, and the already disgraced Timothy deactivated his Twitter account.

Lies or incompetence

These incidences of the Home Office being accused of either lies or incompetence are stacking up. But there is one thing to come out of the department that’s proven true. May promised to create a hostile environment, and she succeeded on that front.

The problem for the Tories is the hostility has turned on them.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Chris McAndrew – Wikimedia / Annika Haas – Wikimedia / Chris McAndrew – Wikimedia

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed