The DWP just quietly revealed tribunals are overturning most of the Universal Credit sanctions they see

'Stop and Scrap' Universal Credit badges and DWP logo
Support us and go ad-free

On Tuesday 15 May, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) released its figures for benefits sanctions up to January 2018. But buried in the statistics is the figure for the outcomes of people who appeal a Universal Credit sanction decision. The figures show that tribunals rule that 83% of sanction decisions they assess are wrong.

The sanctions regime

The Money Advice Service says sanctions occur when:

Benefits… [are] stopped or reduced (cut) if you don’t do the things you agreed to do in your claimant commitment or if you miss appointments or meetings.

In its headline document [pdf], the DWP showed [pdf, p1] that, in February 2018, 4.1% of Universal Credit claimants were sanctioned, which is a fall on previous months. Also, [pdf, p7] 44% of sanctions lasted less than four weeks, and 40% lasted between five and 13 weeks:

Length of Universal Credit sanctions

The DWP’s figures also showed [pdf, p9] that, since 1 August 2015, the majority (66%) of people who were sanctioned stayed on Universal Credit for 180 days after the sanctions. In other words, if sanctions are an incentive to try and get people off benefits, then they aren’t working.

Between 1 August 2015 and 31 January 2018, the DWP applied 442,198 sanctions [xls, table 3_3, row 39, column AH]. Of these, 66% were due to a claimant’s “fail[ure] to comply with an interview requirement”. It does not give any more detail on what this means. But as the Haringey Law Centre points out [pdf, p17]:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Remember that some of these claimants may be people with irregular health concerns which could coincide with a scheduled date for an interview.

An even more worrying figure, however, is buried in the DWP spreadsheet [xls].

The DWP: increasingly wrong

If claimants think the DWP has wrongly sanctioned them, they can ask it to look at the decision again. This is called a mandatory reconsideration. If, after this decision, a claimant still doesn’t agree, they can go to an independent tribunal which will look at the case and decide (an appeal).

Between 1 August 2015 and 31 January 2018, 29% of Universal Credit mandatory reconsiderations ended in the sanction decision being overturned [pdf, p4]. But look into the data not contained in the headline document, and it shows the number of sanctions that tribunals overturn.

In short, independent tribunals have overturned 83% of the DWP’s sanction decisions, when claimants have appealed [xls, table 3_6, row 39 columns H-J].

The numbers of mandatory reconsiderations and appeals where a sanction is overturned are low: 21,736 and 1,067 respectively [xls, table 3_6, row 39, columns F and J].

A DWP spokesperson told The Canary:

We’re committed to ensuring that people receive the benefits they’re entitled to, but it is reasonable that people have to meet certain requirements in return.

Sanctions are only used in a very small percentage of cases when people fail to meet their agreed commitments to look, or prepare, for work.

When sanction decisions are overturned it’s very often because new evidence is provided during mandatory consideration or appeal.

But as the Child Poverty Action Group has pointed out:

The process of mandatory reconsideration and appeal can be daunting and lengthy…

A culture of subservience

Is the length and anxiety of the process putting claimants off challenging sanction decisions? Many would probably tell you anecdotally that the answer to this is ‘yes’. But when tribunals are overturning such a high percentage of sanctions, it’s concerning.

How many DWP sanctioned claimants who don’t appeal have actually been punished incorrectly?

This article was updated at 2.50pm on Wednesday 16 May to reflect a statement from the DWP.

Get Involved!

– Support Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) and the Mental Health Resistance Network, fighting for disabled people’s rights.

Featured image via DPAC and UK government/Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed