The attempted extradition of Julian Assange risks ‘criminalising journalism’

Julian Assange
Support us and go ad-free

The Met Police has confirmed that the UK has received an extradition request from the US relating to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. This follows the arrest of Assange after Ecuador withdrew his asylum in its embassy. The US authorities have also now specified the charge that Assange will face if the extradition proceeds. That charge relates directly to the leaking of documents by whistleblower Chelsea Manning.

As investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald notes, the US indictment amounts to “the criminalization of journalism”. Greenwald says it is a “huge attack on press freedom”. One that could affect media outlets around the world.

Warning signs

The arrest came one day after WikiLeaks revealed that Assange had been placed under surveillance and that the organisation was the target for extortion of €3m.

It also comes a week after Ecuador’s president Lenin Moreno was implicated in a corruption scandal.

Arrest preparations

It transpires that the idea of Ecuador evicting Assange was raised in May 2017 when Donald Trump associate Paul Manafort visited Quito, Ecuador. There he discussed the matter of Assange with Moreno, as well as ways of easing Ecuador’s growing debt.

Meanwhile, a 1,172-page application for “precautionary measures” seen by The Canary reveals that federal prosecutors have in recent months formally approached people in the US, Germany, and Iceland to testify against Assange in return for immunity prosecution.

Those approached are associated with WikiLeaks‘s joint publications with other media outlets about US diplomacy, Guantanamo Bay, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Chelsea Manning is currently incarcerated for refusing to testify to a Grand Jury about WikiLeaks and Assange.


Just after midday on 11 April 2019, the Metropolitan Police confirmed the extradition request.

Assange will next appear via video link at a hearing on May 2 regarding extradition.

According to its extradition laws, the UK must ensure that the “possibility of a domestic prosecution has been properly explored”. And a court can prevent an extradition where:

a substantial measure of the requested person’s conduct was performed in the UK and where it is in the interests of justice to do so.

The bulk of Assange’s work has happened whilst he has been residing in Europe.


The US Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Virginia released a statement specifying the charge that Assange is to face once he is extradited. This is:

conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password to a classified U.S. government computer.

Specifically, the unsealed indictment states that in March 2010, Assange:

engaged in a conspiracy with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army, to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on U.S. Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNet), a U.S. government network used for classified documents and communications.

But as Greenwald also points out:

According to the statement, if found guilty, the accused could face a maximum of five years imprisonment.

More charges?

Greenwald is right – this is an attack on press freedom. One that’s of particular concern to media outlets that published documents simultaneously with WikiLeaks. These outlets include high profile publications such as the Guardian (UK), Bureau of Investigative Journalism (global), and Channel 4’s Dispatches (UK). As Defend WikiLeaks commented:

Assange’s co-publishers at Der Spiegel, Le Monde, New York Times, Espresso and The Guardian, among others, will also risk immediate prosecution in (and extradition to) the US. The prosecution of Assange will have a profound chilling effect on the press and national security reporting. Publishers should not be prosecuted, in the US or elsewhere, for the “crime” of publishing truthful information.

Ben Wizner, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, agreed:

Any prosecution by the United States of Mr. Assange for Wikileaks’ publishing operations would be unprecedented and unconstitutional, and would open the door to criminal investigations of other news organizations.

Or as a WikiLeaks tweet puts it:


In a 2015 article published by the Guardian while she was still incarcerated, Manning crucially observed:

when I was court-martialled for providing government documents and information that I felt were in the public interest to a media organization, the government charged me with “aiding the enemy” – a treason-related offense under the US constitution and military justice system that even civilians may be charged with. During one of my pre-trial hearings in January 2013, the military judge in my case, US Army Colonel Denise Lind, asked the government lawyers: “Does it make any difference – if we substituted Wikileaks for The New York Times: would the government still be charging this case in the manner that it has and proceeding as you’re doing?” An assistant trial counsel for the government answered a straightforward “Yes, Ma’am”.

Indeed, the prosecution of Assange could open up the floodgates globally and threaten press freedom everywhere. We are warned.

Featured image via Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us