The UK government shows it will let Saudi Arabia do just about anything to anyone
A rare event occurred this week: a Western state officially condemned the Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses. But the lack of support from the British government spoke volumes.
On 3 August, the Canadian foreign ministry tweeted that it was “gravely concerned about additional arrests of civil society and women’s rights activists” in the authoritarian kingdom:
Canada is gravely concerned about additional arrests of civil society and women’s rights activists in #SaudiArabia, including Samar Badawi. We urge the Saudi authorities to immediately release them and all other peaceful #humanrights activists.
— Foreign Policy CAN (@CanadaFP) August 3, 2018
This tweet was in response to the recent detainment of women’s rights campaigners Samar Badawi (sister of imprisoned Saudi writer Raif Badawi) and Nassima al-Sadah. The Gulf Centre for Human Rights has described the arrests as part of a wider “crackdown on women human rights defenders” in Saudi Arabia. The British government, however, has been very quiet about this issue – in spite of Saudi Arabia’s public tantrum against Canada.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeSaudi Arabia’s (over)reaction
Saudi Arabia reacted furiously to the tweet, claiming that the Canadian position was a “grave and unacceptable violation of the Kingdom’s laws and procedures”. In a 10-point Twitter statement released on 5 August, the Saudi Arabian foreign ministry ordered the Canadian ambassador to “leave [Saudi Arabia] within the next 24 hours”. It also announced the “freezing of all new trade and investment transactions” between both countries.
#Statement | The negative and surprising attitude of #Canada is an entirely false claim and utterly incorrect.
— Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 (@KSAmofaEN) August 5, 2018
The next day, the Saudi Arabian government ordered its foreign students “out of Canadian schools” and suspended training, scholarships, and fellowships “for about 16,000 Saudi students”. A pro-government Saudi Twitter account also shared a threatening image of a plane flying towards Toronto’s CN Tower:
Now deleted, here a screenshot of the threatening Saudi "infographic" featuring an airliner headed for the Toronto skyline. pic.twitter.com/LrkCLxxjFk
— Tobias Schneider (@tobiaschneider) August 6, 2018
The possible allusion to the September 11 attacks in the US – which involved 15 Saudi Arabian citizens – was quickly noted in the media.
Canada stands its ground; Britain stands in silence
As the dispute escalated, Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau refused to retreat on his government’s position. On 8 August, he said: “Canada will always speak strongly and clearly in private and in public on questions of human rights.” Foreign minister Chrystia Freeland echoed his sentiments.
Such statements are strikingly similar to the British government’s official position on human rights. At the UN Commission on the Status of Women, the UK government declared that it “believes that all girls and women have the right to live free from discrimination and violence and to fulfil their potential”. Another governmental page on human rights vows that Britain will “stand up for human rights… not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because a safer, more prosperous world is in the UK’s national interest”.
But amid the current spat between Canada and Saudi Arabia, the British government has left Canada – an ally and commonwealth partner – totally isolated by remaining silent.
Why the silence?
Britain’s failure to condemn Saudi abuses reveals a special relationship rooted in Saudi Arabia’s economic and regional importance in the Middle East. And it’s nothing new. In 1971, the British ambassador in Riyadh wrote that “the stability of Saudi Arabia and that of the Gulf states are interdependent”. He warned “that ‘radical’ change in one could overthrow the pro-British regimes elsewhere”.
In order to maintain ‘stability’ in Saudi Arabia, Britain trains the Saudi Arabian National Guard and provides the country with massive arms sales. This assistance can then be used to suppress internal dissent and sponsor Saudi regional aggression, the latter “exacerbating the world’s largest humanitarian catastrophe” in Yemen. On 9 August 2018, a Saudi-led coalition airstrike hit a bus carrying children in northern Yemen, killing at least 43 people (including at least 29 children). Saudi airstrikes have been reported to “deliberately” attack “civilians and infrastructure in rebel-held areas” – a clear violation of international law.
The reason for Britain’s silence on Saudi human rights abuses thus becomes very clear. Britain cannot both sponsor and condemn Saudi human rights abuses without a clear contradiction arising. And Britain has now made its choice: to stay silent on Saudi abuses, while hanging Canada out to dry.
Second World War veteran and UK Labour campaigner Harry Leslie Smith tweeted:
Theresa May's lack of moral support for Canada, an ally and member of the commonwealth, in their human rights fight with #SaudiArabia shows that Britain is more concerned with being a merchant of death for the region rather than an agent for peace.
— Harry Leslie Smith (@Harryslaststand) August 7, 2018
It seems that Saudi Arabia is testing the West’s response by launching its recent onslaught on Canada. If Theresa May and the British government remain silent in this dispute, it sends a clear message that Britain will continue to let Saudi Arabia do just about anything to anyone.
Get Involved!
– Write to your local MP about Britain’s silence on Saudi Arabia’s human rights abuses.
– Read more of the Canary’s coverage of the crisis in Yemen
Featured image via Flickr and Flickr
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
