Following Donald Trump’s re-imposition of sanctions on Iran, several media outlets have been reporting that Iran recently unveiled its latest ballistic missile. But all is not as it seems. Because these reports contain a startlingly manipulative and misleading omission.
On 13 August, a number of publications (including France24, Breitbart News and The Times of Israel) published articles reporting that the Iranian government had unveiled a new weapon. The reports appear to have originated from an article from Agence France-Presse, a French newswire similar to Reuters. And they quote Iranian defense minister Amir Hatami as saying:
As we have promised our dear people, we will spare no effort to strengthen the capabilities of the country’s ballistic missiles.
The articles were not based on an outright lie; the unveiling did take place and Hatami did make those remarks. But they’re highly dishonest in how they present these facts.
A “thorny issue” but nothing to do with the Iran nuclear deal
Most of the articles, for example, contain a slightly reworded repeat of the following passage from the AFP article:
Iran’s ballistic program is a thorny issue with the big powers, especially with the United States, but Tehran believes it is crucial for its defensive capabilities in an unstable region.
US President Donald Trump, who unilaterally withdrew his country from the 2015 nuclear deal between the major powers and Iran, called for a new deal that would limit Iran’s ballistic capabilities and its regional interventions.
Most of the articles translate “thorny issue” as “major bone of contention” (the original AFP article is in French), but the major thrust is the same.
The implicit suggestion appears to be that the building of this missile flagrantly flouts the Obama-era nuclear deal and represents the latest act of defiance on the part of Iran. And the conclusion that this goads readers into drawing is clear: this proves that Trump was right to pull out of the Obama-era nuclear deal and re-impose sanctions, as Iran is clearly violating its terms.
But what they fail to mention is that this new missile is not a nuclear weapon; and that it therefore has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the nuclear deal. Yet such inconvenient facts would get in the way of them making this fortuitous event fit within their unspoken narrative.
The recent Iranian missile test has nothing to do with the US sanctions being re-imposed. All Iranian missiles are not nuclear capable warhead missiles… [but] conventional weapons.
Under international law, Iran is perfectly entitled to build up a stockpile of conventional weapons for its military, as are all states. And who can blame Tehran for doing so? Iran has long faced a tripartite threat of hostility from the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia. As Mousavian told The Canary:
For many years, the Israeli-Saudi axis have been pushing the US to attack Iran. They try to limit Iranian missile capability in order to facilitate such an attack. For them [the] John Bolton-Mike Pompeo era is a golden opportunity to realize their dream.
And it’s not like the US, Israel or Saudi Arabia make any secret of their hostility towards Iran. The US has surrounded the oil-rich nation with military bases on all sides, and has issued crippling sanctions for decades.
Israel, meanwhile, has consistently lobbied and saber-rattled against Iran. In February, for example, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu shared the stage with Saudi foreign minister Adel Al Jubeir at a global security conference. And during the event, Netanyahu described Iran as “the greatest threat to our world”, while Al Jubeir said Iran needed to be punished for its “aggressive behavior”.
The very idea that Iran is the hostile party in all of this is, of course, laughable. While it seems that the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia are constantly waging wars or committing human rights abuses in the region, Iran has never launched a major aggressive war in its modern history.
And keep in mind the historical context, too. Because in 1953, the CIA orchestrated a coup in Iran that deposed the democratic government of Muhammad Mossadegh and reinstalled the dictatorial Shah, who ruled Iran with an iron fist for the next 26 years. Then, after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the West backed Iraq’s Saddam Hussein in his devastating war against Iran.
The misleading media reports that continue to come out simply play into the Trump administration’s propaganda. And unfortunately, most readers of the likes of Breitbart aren’t likely to have the insight to spot such underhanded tactics.
– Join or support the Stop the War Coalition. Show your support for Veterans for Peace, who are fighting for peaceful solutions to the world’s problems. And take action with the Campaign Against Arms Trade.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?