As the US prepares its latest coup, it’s time to listen to ordinary Venezuelans
In recent days, the US, Colombian, and Brazilian governments have been pushing for the removal of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro. But as recent data shows, both Washington’s preferred alternative and US-backed intervention are deeply unpopular with the Venezuelan people.
So as the US prepares its latest coup, it’s time for us all to listen to ordinary Venezuelans.
US-backed opposition pushing for a coup
Opposition politician Juan Guaidó became president of Venezuela’s National Assembly on 5 January. The opposition has dominated the National Assembly since its overwhelming electoral victory in 2015. But like the US Democratic Party (which currently controls the House of Representatives), it is not the party of government.
Due in part to a divided opposition and low voter turnout (amid a serious economic crisis), Maduro won 2018’s presidential election. But with US support, Guaidó is now rallying to topple the president based on exaggerated claims of undemocratic behaviour.
On 15 January, for instance, US vice president Mike Pence told Guaidó that the National Assembly was “the only legitimate democratic body” in Venezuela. The Washington Post, meanwhile, has used Guaidó’s own words to call Maduro a “usurper” of power. And Time magazine ran with the headline How Juan Guaidó Could Turn Venezuela Back Toward Democracy.
But all that talk seems to come crashing down when we look at what ordinary Venezuelans think.
Very revealing statistics
According to a recent poll seen by The Canary, the National Assembly is roughly as unpopular as Maduro. The poll – Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus – was published by opposition-aligned company Datanálisis in October 2018 and the study undertaken from 14 to 24 September 2018. Unsurprisingly, it found support for Maduro’s management of the country at 25.8%. However, support for the National Assembly’s management of the country was also very low – at only 25.3%.
Meanwhile, the surveyed Venezuelans viewed economic issues (68.1%) as a much greater issue than corruption (4.2%), Maduro (2.3%), and the opposition (1.0%).
Washington’s supposed concerns about corruption in Venezuela, therefore, seem to far outweigh Venezuelans’ own concerns. This is very important, considering that the US could not use the country’s economic crisis alone to justify intervening. In the words of Prof Steve Ellner:
Why do they [the US]
have to cherry pick with regard to what’s happening on that [alleged democratic violations] front. And the reason is that a difficult economic situation does not justify any kind of intervention… If that was your criterion, then you would be justifying intervention and sanctions throughout Africa, throughout Latin America, throughout the underdeveloped world.
Today, there seems to be no evidence suggesting that the National Assembly is any more popular than it was at the end of 2018. So as in past cases, ‘the only legitimate democratic body’ argument seems to translate as ‘the body most favourable to US interests’.
Ordinary people oppose international intervention
One year prior, independent pollster Hinterlaces found that “76 percent of Venezuelans disapprove of any future international intervention to remove President Nicolas Maduro from power”, and 87% “disapprove of any international military intervention” in the country. People also had “an unfavourable opinion of the Organisation of American States (OAS)”.
The OAS – which critics call “a vehicle for US influence” in Latin America – is now among Guaidó’s chief supporters. And on 11 January, OAS head Luis Almagro tweeted:
We welcome the assumption of @jguaido as interim President of #Venezuela in accordance with Article 233 of the Political Constitution. You have our support, that of the international community and of the people of Venezuela #OEAconVzla https://t.co/6MgJtbvMFd
— Luis Almagro (@Almagro_OEA2015) January 11, 2019
In 2018, meanwhile, Almagro threatened US-backed military intervention in Venezuela “to restore democracy and ease the country’s humanitarian crisis”.
Democracy and humanitarianism, however, don’t seem to be Washington’s global priorities. By sponsoring Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen, for instance, the US is supporting one of the world’s least democratic states while exacerbating the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.
Those who really care about Venezuelan democracy must listen to the will of the Venezuelan people. And at present, they appear to overwhelmingly reject US-backed intervention.
Featured image via Government of Venezuela
- Join the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign.
- Support Witness for Peace in its campaigns for peace and social justice in Latin America. You can also travel on one of its many delegations to the region.
- Check out The Canary‘s Latin America coverage.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversation
Please read our comment moderation policy here.