Charges against Glenn Greenwald are a threat to press freedom everywhere

Greenwald
John McEvoy

On 21 January, Brazilian federal prosecutors charged American journalist Glenn Greenwald for “cybercrimes”. The prosecutors claim that Greenwald “helped, encouraged and guided” a group of hackers who leaked deeply embarrassing information about the Brazilian government. The move has shocked journalists and press freedom advocates worldwide.

Lava Jato

Greenwald is co-founder of the Intercept. In June 2019, the Intercept Brasil released a massive trove of documents revealing “systematic wrongdoing” among top Brazilian prosecutors to prevent the left-wing Workers’ Party (PT) from winning the 2018 presidential election.

The secret documents suggested that the prosecutors were neither apolitical nor confident in the evidence used to jail presidential front-runner Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva – better known as Lula. Lula has since been released, but the corruption probe – widely known as Lava Jato – paved the way for the electoral victory of far-right Jair Bolsonaro.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




Brazil’s supreme court “issued an injunction last year that prohibited Greenwald for being investigated in the alleged hackers’ case”.

Despite this, the practice of lawfare (the weaponisation of the legal system against political opponents) has now been turned on Greenwald, who currently lives in Rio de Janeiro.

“Cybercrimes”

The charge of “cybercrimes” is ominously similar to the indictment of Julian Assange, which was unsealed by the US in April 2019.

As Greenwald himself wrote in April regarding Assange’s indictment:

it simply accuses Assange of trying to help [Chelsea] Manning log into the Defense Department’s computers using a different username so that she could maintain her anonymity while downloading documents in the public interest and then furnish them to WikiLeaks to publish.

Both charges thus relate to standard communication with sources and the publishing of information allegedly obtained illegally. As Brasil Wire has reported over past years, moreover, the US Department of Justice was deeply involved in Brazil’s Lava Jato corruption probe.

Max Blumenthal, another journalist who has been targeted in recent months, asked:

I wonder, did the DOJ have any consultation with Bolsonaro / Moro & company on Greenwald’s indictment, which so closely mirrors Assange’s?

If the US government refuses to defend Greenwald, this question will become more pertinent still. Whether the US green-lit the persecution of Greenwald or not, it remains true that the US indictment against Assange has set a dangerous legal precedent worldwide.

Threat to press freedom everywhere

Journalists and press freedom advocates worldwide responded to the news. Jen Robinson, who has represented Assange, wrote:

WikiLeaks posted:

And US representative Ro Khanna announced he was “crafting legislation to protect journalists”:

Press freedoms don’t disappear overnight. They are gradually eroded by states who first target those presented in the media as too ‘radical’ or ‘unpleasant’ to be worthy of defending. As UN torture expert Nils Melzer told The Canary in June:

In today’s information age, the media have an extraordinary power to shape public opinion, and no one is exempt from their influence.

The media are a veritable ‘fourth power’ in the state next to the traditional branches of government, controlling not only what is said and shown, but also what is not disseminated and, therefore, is withheld from the public.

No caveats necessary: we must draw the line at the first journalist targeted. Solidarity with Greenwald, Assange, and Blumenthal.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Robert O’Neill

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us