• Donate
  • Login
Sunday, June 21, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

With 750 military bases in 80 countries, the US still remains a threat to global peace

Joe Glenton by Joe Glenton
24 September 2021
in Analysis, Global
Reading Time: 3 mins read
169 11
A A
1
Home Global Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The Afghan war may be over, but the vast global network of US military bases still threatens peace, an American think tank has warned. The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft (QI) has published a report on the 750 remaining US military bases in 80 countries.

Its report comes as the US is undertaking a Global Posture Review. The review will examine the US military footprint around the world. And QI said this is a chance to close down bases. Given the cost and the fact many bases are in authoritarian and undemocratic states, it’s hard to argue otherwise.

Expensive and destabilising

The report contains some astonishing statistics on US military installations, including that:

  • “The United States has at least three times as many overseas bases as all other countries combined”.
  • “U.S. bases abroad cost taxpayers an estimated $55 billion annually”.
  • “The United States has nearly three times as many military bases abroad… as U.S. embassies, consulates, and missions”.
  • “Bases abroad have helped the United States launch wars and other combat operations in at least 25 countries since 2001”.
  • “U.S. installations are found in at least 38 non-democratic countries and colonies”.

But it also noted that a full list hasn’t been published by the Pentagon since fiscal year 2018.

When is a base a base?

The authors acknowledge that some bases might not even be counted as bases. They say the Pentagon is wary of how a military presence is defined:

Frequently the Pentagon and U.S. government, as well as host nations, seek to portray a U.S. base presence as “not a U.S. base” to avoid the perception that the United States is infringing on host nation sovereignty (which, in fact, it is).

Closer to home

QI’s breakdown showed that many US bases are in Global South countries. And many of these have authoritarian governments. But European countries are also colonised by the American military, including the UK. This week saw the family of a teenager killed by a US citizen working on a military base reach a resolution a civil claim.

19-year-old Harry Dunn was killed after being struck by a car in 2019. Anne Sacoolas, allegedly an intelligence officer for the US government, claimed diplomatic immunity and fled to the US. Sacoolas may have been working at RAF Croughton, Northamptonshire. Despite the name, RAF Croughton is a US spy base.

Closures

QI says closing bases is politically possible. They say that recent presidents from Bill Clinton though to Donald Trump all closed bases around the world regularly. There’s nothing to stop Biden, who has pledged to reset US foreign policy, doing the same.

It said the review meant there was a “historic opportunity” to reduce the US military footprint, saving taxpayer cash and improving “national and international security in the process”.

And QI has a point. Closing bases is a good idea in economic, political, and moral terms. The question is, will the new administration muster the political will to do so?

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons/ Sgt Chris Stone

Tags: Afghanistanwar
Share134Tweet84ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Judge jails former Paralympian who fought to avoid climate breakdown

Next Post

Brazil’s president says PM asked for ’emergency’ deal for unspecified food

Next Post
Jair Bolsonaro and Boris Johnson

Brazil’s president says PM asked for ’emergency’ deal for unspecified food

empty supermarket shelves

One in six unable to buy essential food items in past two weeks, survey suggests

A BP petrol garage

Boris Johnson says all is well despite current Brexit chaos over fuel

DPAC Audio Riot against the DWP and Tories

Disabled people are staging a 'riot' over Tory and DWP persecution

Keir Starmer looking backwards

As the UK suffers multiple crises, Keir Starmer is busy trying to make Labour less democratic

Comments 1

  1. bkwanab says:
    5 years ago

    Part of the cost of maintaining these bases overseas are the base shopping malls, golf courses, bowling alleys, and on base clubs etc. that have to be staffed and maintained, all at the tax payers expense. It was the fact that Americans were living and consuming alcohol on bases in Saudi Arabia, where the drinking liqueur is forbidden under their Muslim laws, that inspired Osama bin Laden to act to convince the US to close the bases there. The end result was 9/11.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Canary Catch Up
Trending

Canary Catch Up: The Take That Circus comes to town

by Rachel Charlton-Dailey
21 June 2026
Andrew Tate, Rupert Lowe, and Tommy Robinson
Trending

Alleged rapist Andrew Tate to fund rape gang documentary

by Willem Moore
21 June 2026
Digital creator Mersey Side police and a racist message containing misinformation
Trending

Digital creator spreads racist misinfo following Bootle attack

by Willem Moore
21 June 2026
Jonathan Bartley of the Green Party, as well as Andy Burnham and Keir Starmer of the Labour Party
Trending

Bartley sums up why voters abandoned Labour for the Greens

by Willem Moore
21 June 2026
Andy Burnham in front of an image of a field
Trending

Burnham proposes land value tax as progressive voters sour on him

by Willem Moore
21 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart