Energy giant Shell just had a bad week. The next one could be even worse.

A placard at a protest against Shell's seismic testing along the Wild Coast that read " See Shell Kill Sea Life At The Sea Shore"
Support us and go ad-free

Energy giant Shell took a reputational hit on 23 May. A longstanding consultant quit, accusing the company of enduring and wilful environmental harm, in a dramatic and very public fashion.

The coming week could be even worse for the dirty energy behemoth. That’s because a court hearing begins on 30 May in South Africa – one which could ruin its plans to blast the ocean in search of more fossil fuels.

Save the Wild Coast

As The Canary previously reported, a number of groups and communities mounted legal action against Shell towards the end of 2021. The cases opposed the company’s imminent plans to conduct seismic testing along the Wild Coast. Such tests indicate whether there are fossil fuels present under the sea floor. It involves blasting the ocean with sound pulses on a regular basis over a period of months.

As the Daily Maverick reported, current scientific evidence shows that seismic surveys widely and negatively impact ocean ecosystems, from tiny organisms like zooplankton to large mammals such as whales.

Natural Justice and other environmental and human rights-focused groups filed an urgent interdict application at the end of November. The judge in that case ruled against them, so Shell started its testing. Wild Coast community members and groups filed a further urgent interdict in early December. The judge ruled in their favour. The judgment put a stop to Shell’s seismic activities, pending further legal proceedings.

Back in court

Those legal proceedings are due to take place between 30 May and 1 June. In the interim, two groups involved in the earlier case – Wild Justice and Greenpeace Africa – have applied to join the case brought by Wild Coast community members and groups. So the upcoming proceedings will also consider that joinder application.

Both the South African government and Shell will be under the spotlight in the hearing. The applicants will argue that Shell doesn’t have the necessary environmental authorisation for the testing under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) – nor has it adequately consulted with affected communities. Moreover, they assert that Shell’s Environmental Management Program (EMPr) for the testing is insufficient in regards to environmental harm and considering the rights of communities.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, meanwhile, stands accused of failing to consider both climate change and the interests of the “whole community”, including non-human ocean dwellers, when granting the exploration rights.

In the previous proceedings, Shell argued that its EMPr serves as a NEMA authorisation. In a post about the Wild Coast situation, the company’s website asserts:

We aim to minimise the impact of our projects on the environment and to be a good neighbour wherever we work, by contributing to the well-being of neighbouring communities.

A good neighbour?

The climate group Follow This recently provided Shell an opportunity to back up its claim to be a ‘good neighbour’, environmentally-speaking. The group, which attempts to secure change “from the inside” through proposing resolutions at shareholder meetings, called for the company to strengthen its climate goals at its AGM on 24 May.

As the Guardian reported, Shell’s board urged investors to reject the Follow This resolution. Ultimately, the resolution only received 20% of the votes, meaning it failed to pass.

Shell’s opposition to the proposal gives further weight to Caroline Dennett’s characterisation of the company. The safety consultant, who worked with Shell for 11 years, dramatically quit on 23 May. In a LinkedIn post explaining the decision, she said:

Shell is fully aware that their continued oil & gas extraction and expansion projects are causing extreme harms, to our climate, environment, nature and to people.

The consultant accused the company of “double-talk” on climate and a “disregard” for the risks involved.

The evidence clearly shows that fossil fuel companies like Shell continue to put their inflated bottom lines first in the face of the climate and biodiversity crises.

Legal action, such as the imminent hearing in South Africa, provides an opportunity to force at least some of their expansion plans into reverse.

Featured image via SABC News / YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us