Homeless people are stuck because of a ‘crippling’ shortage of affordable homes

Support us and go ad-free

Homeless people who have asked for help from their local council are “trapped” on the streets, sofa surfing and in B&Bs. And this is due to a “crippling” shortage of affordable homes, a charity has warned.

Homeless charity Crisis conducted a study. It found that almost half (46%) of those who sought help from their local authority remained homeless after their contact with the housing team ended.

Without enough available homes, councils are increasingly having to rely on expensive temporary accommodation or push people towards the private rented sector, the charity said.

The study

Its new report is titled ‘I Hoped There’d Be More Options’. According to the report, 58% of those who had contacted housing teams for support didn’t think their living situation was suitable for their needs.

This was for reasons including their homelessness not being resolved, their accommodation being temporary, affordability concerns and poor-quality conditions.

Crisis surveyed 1,424 people, carried out in-depth interviews with 193 people, and spoke to 37 staff members in local authority housing teams. This formed part of a three-year study into the impact of the 2018 Homelessness Reduction Act (HRA).

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The research covered six local authority areas in England – two in London, two northern cities and two cities near semi-rural areas. And it took place over three waves between April 2018 and August 2021.

The HRA requires local authorities to take “reasonable steps” to try to prevent or relieve a household’s homelessness by helping them to secure accommodation for at least six months.

Barriers

The analysis found the legislation has been “instrumental” in ensuring homeless people get help, preventing others from losing their homes, and widening access to support since its introduction four years ago. But “inbuilt barriers” mean that one in six people are being turned away, for reasons including that they have no link to the local area, or their immigration status, the research found.

And respondents said they had been refused a property because they were receiving benefits – which is unlawful – or because they had children.

One mother in rented accommodation said she hid the fact she had a young son from her landlord to secure the property.

Staff who the charity interviewed said a lack of housing options was the greatest barrier to placing more people in secure and suitable homes.

No long term solutions

Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said councils are trapped in a loop. They’re spending more on temporary accommodation which keeps people in “limbo”, instead of investing in sustainable solutions to end someone’s homelessness in the long-term.

He said:

It’s shocking that councils are being forced to leave people living in dingy B&Bs infested with mice, while others live at the mercy of being turfed off the sofa onto the streets at a moment’s notice because they do not have enough affordable housing to go around.

He said the government must “get to grips” with building the social homes “we desperately need”.

Bob Blackman MP, who introduced the Bill which led to the HRA, said it’s “heartening” to see that it has resulted in greater prevention of homelessness. But he said he’s disappointed that the legislation is being constrained “by a severe lack of social housing”.

He said:

The reality is, we cannot continue to bury our heads in the sand on this issue. While it’s positive the Government is acting on section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions, it will remain an incomplete approach if nothing is done to build more social housing, whilst also ensuring that the changes to ending section 21 don’t take away key responsibilities from local authorities to prevent homelessness in the long run

Government response

Crisis is calling on the government to set a target of delivering an additional 90,000 social homes each year for the next 15 years, and substantially increase the delivery of social rented housing.

A spokesperson for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities said:

The number of rough sleepers has fallen in every region of England, taking levels to an eight-year low.

In Autumn 2021, the government estimated that the number of people sleeping rough in England fell by between 9 and 10% since 2020. But these figures still represent an increase in rough sleepers by between 33% (rest of England) and 52% (London) increase since 2010.

The spokesperson said:

But we know we must go further, so we’re investing £2 billion over the next three years to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping.

This builds on the success of the Homelessness Reduction Act which has secured accommodation for over 475,000 households who were homeless or at risk of homelessness.

Our significant £11.5 billion investment in affordable housing is also supporting thousands of people into safe and secure homes.

It’s safe to say that since 2010, Tory cuts worth billions to government grants for social housing have contributed to the current housing crisis.

‘Chronic shortage of housing’

Chris Norris, policy director for the National Residential Landlords Association, said:

No landlord should discriminate against tenants because they are in receipt of benefits, however, the Government could help by ending the illogical freeze on housing benefit rates. This would give tenants and landlords much needed confidence that rents can be paid.

More broadly, at the heart of the tragedy of homelessness is the chronic shortage of housing across the board, including in the private rented sector.

It is time for the Government to get a grip and work on pro-growth measures to ensure tenants, including those who are currently homeless, can access the homes they need, where they need them.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. would the £400.00 cash payment offered to home owner maybe help the homless out has well yes or no??
      just emailed this Govt leader today 31.5.2022 and posted it on websites

      BEFORE YOU STOP THIS POST
      I have just sent it to Govt leader plus new programmes to read over so removing it from here will not make it go away Colne Talk staff. https://www.quora.com/
      LINK to post 31.5.2022
      Question of the day voters in the U.K.
      Q—What is keeping Boris Johnson in power?
      Point I will make that could be keeping in his JOB as P.M.
      Possible bribes plus funding from out ide the U.K. AREA
      Point -1
      Well possibly dodgy dirty money from rich party funder from outside the
      U.K. THAT NEED A Puppet P.M running our country the U.K.
      Point -2
      Possibly Sunak + lying Boris bribing his M.P. + Minister to keep supporting him (because they do not have the balls or tits to remove him)
      Point-3
      (MAY-BE A GOOD BRIBE TAXPAYERS?)
      I like the bribe of the £400.00 we all get on investigating this matter a bit more I see every home get the payment SO if M.P. + Minister + lying Boris or any public person own more than one home they can claim the cash for the rest of their properties this is the biggest BRIBE in this country for M.P. plus Minister support I can every remember for a P.M. to keep their job voters.
      I do hope Sunak + Lying Boris can fully explain to us voters the thinking behinds the £400.00 cash bribe to their party members & rich party funding that own more than one Home now (they may rent out to other tenants?)
      Concluding
      Voter of U.K. the members of Troy party have failed us all trashed our way of life the place were parliament is run from (No10-No11) is a den of dodgy Tory Govt workers that have no respect for us voter any more or our country so come next G.E. we must get shut of this infected Tory party until they clean up their ACT and cut out the infected part of their party starting with lying Boris voter we cannot go on with a liar in control of our country money plus laws -TAXPAYERS plus rules he will brake time & time again just to get this own way.

    2. Evicted citizens — especially those enduring mental health tribulations (‘poor in spirit’) — often become the long-termed homeless. In effect, they then cannot afford an official residence and therefor, by extension, are too poor to be permitted to practice what’s frequently platitudinously described as all citizens’ right to vote in elections. …

      It’s atrocious that such a large number of human beings, however precious their souls, can be considered thus treated as though disposable, even to otherwise free, democratic and relatively civilized nations. (One can also observe this with the many Canadian indigenous children having been buried in unmarked graves.) When those people take note of this, tragically, they’re vulnerable to begin subconsciously perceiving themselves as beings without value.

      Though perhaps subconsciously, a somewhat similar inhuman(e) devaluation is observable in external attitudes toward the daily civilian lives lost in protractedly devastating war zones and famine-stricken nations; the worth of such life will be measured by its ‘productivity’, overabundance and/or the protracted conditions under which it suffers. Thus, those people can eventually receive meagre column inches on the back page of the First World’s daily news.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.