• Donate
  • Login
Saturday, July 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Japan set to rewrite defence policy in line with US interests

Joe Glenton by Joe Glenton
15 December 2022
in Analysis, Global
Reading Time: 2 mins read
168 5
A A
1
Home Global Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Japan is expected to announce its biggest defence overhaul in decades by Friday 16 December. The country will hike spending, reshape its military command, and acquire new US-made missiles.

The policies will reshape the defence landscape of a country in which the post-war constitution doesn’t even officially recognise the military.

Prime minister Fumio Kishida said:

Fundamentally strengthening our defence capabilities is the most urgent challenge in this severe security environment.

We will urgently ramp up our defence capabilities over the next five years.

Controversial spending boost

The mainstream media has generally framed the shift as a result of Tokyo’s fears about China’s growing military strength and regional posturing. Other threats, ranging from North Korean missile launches to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have also been blamed.

Key among the new policies is a pledge to boost defence spending to 2% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) by 2027. This would bring Japan in line with NATO members.

Notably, this marks a significant increase from historic spending of around 1%. And there’s also been criticism over how Japan will finance the spending increase.

Counterstrike

The money will fund projects including the acquisition of what Japan calls “counterstrike capacity” – the ability to hit launch sites that threaten the country, even preemptively.

Japan has previously shied away from acquiring that ability due to disputes over whether it could violate its constitution’s limit on self-defence.

In a nod to the controversy, the policy documents will reportedly insist that Japan remains committed to a “self-defence-oriented security policy” and will “not become a military power”.

Part of the counterstrike capacity will come from up to 500 US-made Tomahawk cruise missiles. Japan is reportedly considering purchasing these as a backstop while it develops longer-range missiles domestically.

US influence

Any discourse on Japan’s increasingly militaristic outlook should bear in mind the role of its major ally, the US. As the Canary reported in May, US influence is central to Japan’s rebirth as a military power.

Japanese politics scholar Ra Mason argued at the time:

The US has been pressuring Japan for some time to increase its defence spending to share the security bill in the Asia-Pacific region.

At the same time, the UK and Italy are looking to profit from Japan’s military expansion. The three nations are currently working out a deal for next-generation jet fighters.

War in Asia?

It remains to be seen how China will respond to the US-led militarisation of Japan. However, it seems unlikely that the placement of more US-made missiles and increased defence spending will discourage the Chinese leadership’s own expansionist ambitions in the region.

What we need now more than ever is diplomacy and consensus, not pouring billions into new weapons and missiles.

Additional reporting by AFP.

 Featured image via Wikimedia Commons/Toshiro Aoki, cropped to 770 x 403, licenced under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Tags: ChinaUSwar
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

New developments may prove a game-changer for Julian Assange

Next Post

Labour has expelled a Jewish NEC member from the party

Next Post
Labour has expelled Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi

Labour has expelled a Jewish NEC member from the party

New DWP logo in relation to a PIP systems crash

DWP wasted £66m that was supposed to help prevent claimant suicides

A photo of a Stamp Out Racism graffiti alongside a photo of an anti-racism demonstration.

41% of the public being racist should be no surprise to anyone

Afghan civilians sit against a wall.

Government announces SAS war crimes inquiry - but will it deliver justice?

An EDL rally

Fascism rising: security committee warns of rise in right-wing terror threat

Comments 1

  1. Red Star says:
    4 years ago

    “It remains to be seen how China will respond to the US-led militarisation of Japan. However, it seems unlikely that the placement of more US-made missiles and increased defence spending will discourage the Chinese leadership’s own expansionist ambitions in the region.”

    I’m sure the USA has pencilled in a frontline role for Japan, once they (USA) manufacture an incident in Taiwan and turn it into the next Ukraine (or the next Iran, whichever comes first).

    As it lurches around the globe sowing chaos and destruction, the US Empire has three important rules:

    1. Never, ever on home ground.

    2. Never use US troops on the ground if you can convince a proxy to do it for you. That’s you, Japan…

    3. Always sell them arms.

    As for ” the Chinese leadership’s own expansionist ambitions in the region”, China tends to gain influence (in Africa and the South Pacific, for example) by doing something that most Western leaders can’t get their heads around – investing in the infrastructures of their partners. Building up , in other words.

    As distinct from the American “bomb them back to the Stone Age” tearing down approach.

    If we tried the Chinese rather than the American approach, perhaps we wouldn’t have so many refugees to worry about.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sinn Féin
Analysis

Sinn Féin confirm intention to back continuation of cruel, colonial hare coursing

by Robert Freeman
4 July 2026
Wimbledon
Skwawkbox

Wimbledon: Zeynep Sönmez’s watermelon symbol ‘below threshold’ for ban

by Skwawkbox
4 July 2026
Lebanon
Analysis

Lebanon — fury at the government sell-out of the south

by Guy Smallman
4 July 2026
Domestic abuse
Analysis

Sexual assault on sedated partners becoming an organised crime as “truly international” network exposed

by Maddison Wheeldon
4 July 2026
Ronaldo v Modric last dance. Ronaldo marches on as Modric bows out
Sports

Cristiano Ronaldo’s World Cup dream stays still alive as Luka Modric bows out

by Faz Ali
3 July 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart