Japan set to rewrite defence policy in line with US interests

Japan is expected to announce its biggest defence overhaul in decades by Friday 16 December. The country will hike spending, reshape its military command, and acquire new US-made missiles.
The policies will reshape the defence landscape of a country in which the post-war constitution doesn’t even officially recognise the military.
Prime minister Fumio Kishida said:
Fundamentally strengthening our defence capabilities is the most urgent challenge in this severe security environment.
We will urgently ramp up our defence capabilities over the next five years.
Controversial spending boost
The mainstream media has generally framed the shift as a result of Tokyo’s fears about China’s growing military strength and regional posturing. Other threats, ranging from North Korean missile launches to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have also been blamed.
Key among the new policies is a pledge to boost defence spending to 2% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) by 2027. This would bring Japan in line with NATO members.
Read on...
Notably, this marks a significant increase from historic spending of around 1%. And there’s also been criticism over how Japan will finance the spending increase.
Counterstrike
The money will fund projects including the acquisition of what Japan calls “counterstrike capacity” – the ability to hit launch sites that threaten the country, even preemptively.
Japan has previously shied away from acquiring that ability due to disputes over whether it could violate its constitution’s limit on self-defence.
In a nod to the controversy, the policy documents will reportedly insist that Japan remains committed to a “self-defence-oriented security policy” and will “not become a military power”.
Part of the counterstrike capacity will come from up to 500 US-made Tomahawk cruise missiles. Japan is reportedly considering purchasing these as a backstop while it develops longer-range missiles domestically.
US influence
Any discourse on Japan’s increasingly militaristic outlook should bear in mind the role of its major ally, the US. As the Canary reported in May, US influence is central to Japan’s rebirth as a military power.
Japanese politics scholar Ra Mason argued at the time:
The US has been pressuring Japan for some time to increase its defence spending to share the security bill in the Asia-Pacific region.
At the same time, the UK and Italy are looking to profit from Japan’s military expansion. The three nations are currently working out a deal for next-generation jet fighters.
War in Asia?
It remains to be seen how China will respond to the US-led militarisation of Japan. However, it seems unlikely that the placement of more US-made missiles and increased defence spending will discourage the Chinese leadership’s own expansionist ambitions in the region.
What we need now more than ever is diplomacy and consensus, not pouring billions into new weapons and missiles.
Additional reporting by AFP.
Featured image via Wikimedia Commons/Toshiro Aoki, cropped to 770 x 403, licenced under CC BY-SA 3.0.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
“It remains to be seen how China will respond to the US-led militarisation of Japan. However, it seems unlikely that the placement of more US-made missiles and increased defence spending will discourage the Chinese leadership’s own expansionist ambitions in the region.”
I’m sure the USA has pencilled in a frontline role for Japan, once they (USA) manufacture an incident in Taiwan and turn it into the next Ukraine (or the next Iran, whichever comes first).
As it lurches around the globe sowing chaos and destruction, the US Empire has three important rules:
1. Never, ever on home ground.
2. Never use US troops on the ground if you can convince a proxy to do it for you. That’s you, Japan…
3. Always sell them arms.
As for ” the Chinese leadership’s own expansionist ambitions in the region”, China tends to gain influence (in Africa and the South Pacific, for example) by doing something that most Western leaders can’t get their heads around – investing in the infrastructures of their partners. Building up , in other words.
As distinct from the American “bomb them back to the Stone Age” tearing down approach.
If we tried the Chinese rather than the American approach, perhaps we wouldn’t have so many refugees to worry about.