Hong Kong disqualifies four pro-democracy legislators

Hong Kong has disqualified four pro-democracy legislators. It comes after Beijing passed a resolution that would allow the local government to remove politicians from their positions if they’re deemed a threat to national security.

The disqualification came after meetings of China’s National People’s Congress Standing Committee on 10 and 11 November.

China’s official Xinhua news agency said the committee passed a resolution to disqualify those who:

  • Support Hong Kong’s independence.
  • Refuse to acknowledge China’s sovereignty over the city.
  • Commit acts that threaten national security.
  • Ask external forces to interfere in the city’s affairs.

Hong Kong China
Hong Kong’s pro-democracy legislators pose before a press conference at the city’s Legislative Council on Monday (Vincent Yu/AP)

“This is clearly in breach of basic law”

The four politicians are Alvin Yeung, Dennis Kwok, Kwok Ka-ki and Kenneth Leung. They confirmed that they were disqualified in a news conference. Dennis Kwok said:

In terms of legality and constitutionality, obviously from our point of view this is clearly in breach of basic law and our rights to participate in public affairs, and a failure to observe due process

Read on...

On Monday 9 November, 19 politicians from the pro-democracy camp said they would resign en masse if Beijing moved to disqualify any pro-democracy legislators.

A mass resignation by the pro-democracy camp would leave Hong Kong’s legislature with only pro-Beijing politicians. The pro-Beijing camp already makes up a majority of the city’s legislature. So a mass resignation would allow the passing of bills favoured by Beijing without opposition.

Hong Kong Lawmakers Disqualified
The disqualified politicians at their Wednesday press conference (Vincent Yu/AP)

Postponed election

Earlier in 2020, the four now-disqualified pro-democracy politicians were barred from running for legislative elections. The elections were originally meant to happen in September before the government stated it would postpone them by a year. This was due to the coronavirus (Covid-19) situation. The four men later remained in their posts following the postponement.

The pro-democracy camp criticised the postponement as an attempt to block them from taking a majority of seats in the legislature. It came after they had held an unofficial pro-democracy primary to decide which candidates to field. 600,000 voters had participated in that process.

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam was expected to hold a news conference to address the disqualifications.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. This is a rather mealy-mouthed account. Was the author afraid of offending Beijing?

      I do not know enough about Hong Kong politics to understand exactly what is happening and this article leaves all the important stuff unexplained.

      Here’s what I think is going on: Hong Kong had rights guaranteed under international treaty. These rights included a degree of devolved government – in local matters, Hong Kong voters could elect their own regional govt through a democratic process which was generally trusted by the voters. Then Beijing decided unilaterally to change the rules, to reduce Hong Kong independence, end democracy-as-it-was-done-in-HK, and impose a more direct rule. This sparked a backlash from Hong Kong people who made ‘umbrella protests’ and generally fought as best they could using non-violent means to hold on to their democracy. Fast forward. Beijing blocked four pro-democracy candidates from standing for election. Their collegues decided to resign in solidarity. Now the only politicians in the HK legislature are pro-Beijing people. Have I got that basically right?

      My response is (1) I generally support democracy since it generally provides a better life for ‘ordinary people’ against the abuses of the powerful. (2) I would therefore generally support pro-democracy politicians and popular protests in defence of democracy (3) But many groups claim to be ‘democratic’ which I utterly loathe and despise (4) Are the pro-democracy politicians in HK people I’d support if I were a HK voter, or are they more like Trump, Putin, Erdogan and others who use the rhetoric of democracy but live like dictators? (5) Beijing implies these pro-democracy politicians are a ‘threat to the state’ – is this self-serving nonsense or are some of these anti-Beijing activists actually agents provocateurs, CIA stooges etc? I think it unlikely but what is the evidence either way?

      I see an analogy with the UK. Here Johnson (i.e. Gove/Cummings) is determined to reverse devolution and block Scottish independence to save the Union. ‘Saving the Union’ is meaningless mystification – it really means imposing centralised control on a people who have consistently rejected it through repeated ballots. Johnson/London seem to be planning to do to Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland what Xi/Beijing are doing to Hong Kong. I support the end of the Union as it has no benefit to the ordinary citizen. If I think of the HK pro-democracy politicians as analogues of the SNP then my sympathy is all with them. This is true even if the SNP is more rightwing on some policy issues than I am myself.

      I come here to learn about stuff. Frustrating that the foreign reporting is not very helpful. Oh well, guess I have to do my own homework.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.