Tom Watson is conducting a pincer movement to stranglehold Jeremy Corbyn

Labour MPs Tom Watson and Jeremy Corbyn

Tom Watson is conducting a pincer movement to stranglehold the Labour leadership. After eight Labour MPs defected to the new centrist group, Watson and the right-wing are using the threat of more defections to force concessions from Jeremy Corbyn and the membership. Indeed, Watson is already making demands through his new parliamentary faction: the Future Britain Group.

But Corbyn should hold firm. Because Labour will trounce the Independent Group in a general election. And that’s ultimately what counts.

The pincer movement

With the explicit threat of more defections, the deputy leader has put forward a series of demands via his Future Britain Group. One of these demands is for Corbyn to introduce a system for MPs to elect some members of the shadow cabinet. An interesting proposal given Watson described shadow cabinet elections as a “massive distraction from our job in hand” in 2011.

But perhaps a massive distraction is Watson’s aim. Because the last time Corbyn housed openly hostile right-wingers in his shadow cabinet they thanked him with a coup. Blaming Corbyn for the Brexit vote in June 2016, shadow ministers drip-fed resignations to the corporate media, maximising their damage against the leadership.

They argued Corbyn didn’t campaign hard enough for remain, ignoring the structural reasons for a lack of progressive voices in the EU debate. New Statesman analysis shows that all the UK broadcasters systematically marginalised Labour voices during the 2016 referendum. Labour accounted for 18% of political contributions to UK broadcaster’s main evening bulletins, compared with 71% from the Tories.

With Watson and the right on the move again, the 2016 coup should be a sharp history lesson for the Corbyn-led movement.

Middle finger to the membership

During the 2016 coup, the pro-establishment Labour forces showed a complete disregard for democracy. First, right-wing MPs relentlessly attempted to bully Corbyn into resigning, in what Diane Abbott described as trying “to break him as a man”. At the peak of the coup, MPs lined up to launch tirades against their leader in his office. Abbott further said MPs attacked Corbyn in “the most contemptuous terms possible, pausing only to text their abuse to journalists waiting outside”. When that failed, the Labour right-wing attempted to rig the incoming leadership contest against Corbyn and the UK citizens who support his policies:

Read on...

  • They tried to remove Corbyn from the ballot paper, so Labour supporters couldn’t even vote for him.
  • They raised the registered supporters’ fee from £3 to £25 to try and price out working class people from voting.
  • They barred over 100,000 newer members from voting altogether.

At the time, shadow chancellor John McDonnell described the election as effectively “rigged”. But that didn’t stop Corbyn receiving an even greater democratic mandate from before, beating contender Owen Smith with a whopping 62% of the vote.

It’s coup 2.0

After the failed coup in 2016, Watson and the right-wing faction are trying a different approach. Instead of ‘resign or shadow ministers will’, the game-plan has changed to ‘concede policy decisions to us or they’ll be more defections’. Suggestions that Watson wants the leadership are likely misplaced because the deputy leader must know that’s impossible: 65% of Labour members believe Corbyn is doing well as leader, according to polling in January 2019.

Instead, Watson and the right seem to be trying to grab power from Corbyn through a pincer movement. This is an insult and a direct challenge to the members who overwhelmingly voted for Corbyn in two leadership elections. Then, in the 2017 general election, the policy platform that members voted for increased Labour’s voteshare by more than at any point since 1945.

Disregarding democracy like in the 2016 coup, Watson is conducting a shameless power-grab, while pretending to be the Labour movement’s friend. But Watson and the warmongering so-called centrists are much less powerful than they’d have you (and the leadership) believe. In September 2018, a YouGov poll found that just 1% of Labour supporters voted for the party in 2017 because of the individual MP. 83%, meanwhile, said they voted for Labour either because of its policies or values. On the backs of their individual MPs, the Independent Group can therefore only appeal to 1% of Labour voters. And the ‘centrist’ politics they champion are collapsing across the globe. Without the Labour brand, they are nothing.

So the leadership should adamantly refuse to make any more concessions to Watson’s pincer movement. What’s important is that the leadership holds onto the Labour brand. Then the Corbyn-led movement can simply field more impressive candidates than the bunch who’ve left. That shouldn’t be hard.

Featured image via Tom Watson/ YouTube and Sky News/YouTube

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m ashamed to have voted for Watson as deputy leader as I didn’t realise what a sly one he is. My view is that we should have more defections. We don’t need people like Wes Streeting et al., and we could replace them with Corbynites to bring about proper change our society needs. I really hope Corbyn stays firm and doesn’t give in to this pressure. Of course it’s now clearer than ever the motives behind the anti-Semitic stories in the press. Tax-dodger Hodge and the rest of the LFI are terrified of a leader who fights for Palestinian rights. They know that’s not anti-Semitic; it’s what you could call common human decency. Israel commits criminal acts, there’s no getting away from it. Bring back Chris Williamson, he was simply stating the truth. We must not let pro-Israel politicians (most of whom aren’t Jewish) prevent us from speaking out against Israeli atrocities.

    2. So Tom Watson is Deputy Leader of the Labour Party ,a leader of Future Britian Group, and a supporter of Labour Friends of Isreal.
      So when all these young people inspired by Corbyn voted for him who would of thought to ask ” which Labour Party am I voting for?” A party undergoing dramatic change, and with establishment politicians who are totally
      disconnected with the public mood as to why they were elected.
      I suspect these establishment politicians are most fearful of the change in how Labour MP’s are elected by their riding members, and are positioning themselves into “think tank” party’s like the ERG of the Tories as a way of ????. Glamour?
      The fractious nature of this will do them in I’m sure.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.