Oil and gas bigwig launches an absurd defence of the UK’s North Sea drilling plans

A North Sea oil rig in a storm
Support us and go ad-free

The fossil fuel industry used to deny that climate change was a thing, or that it had anything to do with it. With so much of the world now literally on fire, however, that argument no longer washes. So the industry has taken to what’s known as ‘greenwashing’ to protect its bottom line. Amid an avalanche of criticism over a planned new oilfield in the North Sea, the CEO of Oil and Gas UK (OGUK) has provided the perfect illustration of what greenwashing looks like.

According to Deirdre Michie, the Cambo oil field “will actually help the UK cut its carbon emissions”. That’s right, apparently expanding fossil fuel production is an answer to the climate crisis.

Nope

Michie laid out her argument in the Scotsman. It was nuanced, as all good greenwashing is, but it was largely centred on the notion that “the UK will still need oil and gas for decades to come” to fulfil its “energy needs”. The OGUK CEO argued that to meet that “need” the country will have to import dirty energy with high emissions from overseas if it doesn’t litter the North Sea with more oil rigs.

The Scotsman published a counter-argument article the following day. Written by the Scottish Greens’ Ariane Burgess, it drove an inconvenient wedge through Michie’s core argument, saying that:

North Sea production already has more oil than we can afford to burn if we are to meet the Paris Agreement’s climate commitments

As a Twitter user pointed out, even the International Energy Agency (IEA), which typically produces analysis that is fossil fuel industry-friendly, has called for limiting the exploitation of new sources of fossil fuels:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Michie argued that the Cambo project is not “new” and that its “exploration licence was granted back in 2001”. However, some experts have asserted that much of the fossil fuel extraction already planned or underway needs to halt if we are to limit global warming.

Essentially, just because the UK government gave the project a thumbs up back in 2001, that doesn’t mean it can or should ignore the current climate-related flames around the world and carry on regardless.

Exports, anyone?

Michie also failed to point out a critical fact related to her core assertion. Not all oil produced in the UK stays in the UK. In fact, the country became a net exporter of oil in 2020, when taking petroleum products into account too, for the first time in a decade. That means it exported more than it imported. The trend appears to be continuing with government statistics showing that in the first quarter of 2021, “the UK exported more primary oils than it imported for only the second time since 2005”.

Funnily enough, though, the OGUK CEO didn’t argue for the government to ban all oil exports moving forward. In fact, she didn’t mention exports at all. Banning exports would also limit the ‘need’ for imports of emissions-heavy oil from elsewhere. But of course, it’s not in the fossil fuel industry’s interest to call for bans on trade.

For growth’s sake

The whole idea of the ‘energy needs’ of the UK deserves scrutiny too. Energy use is closely linked to another prominent ‘need’ in the UK – one that’s built into the economic system itself. It’s the ‘need’ to constantly expand that is at the core of the capitalist system, otherwise known as the never-ending and holy grail of economic growth (just for growth’s sake). But this economic system has caused the climate and biodiversity emergencies we are in, so its irrationality is now glaringly apparent. That’s why a number of reports have landed on the UK government’s desk this year calling for its overhaul.

So no, the expansion of fossil fuel exploitation isn’t an answer to the climate crisis. System change is.

Featured image via BBC News / YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

  • Sign the petition against the Cambo project.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us