A young Tory decided to mock votes for 16-year-olds and it is not going down well
Tom Harwood is a Conservative commentator who became well known for his anti-NUS (National Union of Students) campaign. He’s now running a new satirical campaign called Votes At 12. Harwood’s stunt of fighting for the right of 12-year-olds to vote is his way of mocking the campaign for votes for 16-year-olds. But he doesn’t seem to be getting the response he wanted.
Today we officially launch #VotesAt12!
👏👏Visit https://t.co/M7KnRGSyuY today!👏👏 pic.twitter.com/niXE8gr69R— Votes at 12 Campaign (@votesat12) February 22, 2018
Harwood on votes for 16-year-olds
Now an NUS delegate, Harwood appeared on the BBC’s Daily Politics to make his case against votes for 16-year-olds. He said:
A lot of the arguments about votes at 16 – in fact, almost all of them – can actually be applied to 12-year-olds. You might say that 12-year-olds aren’t allowed to buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, drive, fight for their country, marry without permission – all of these things – but that’s true of 16-year-olds as well.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free
In his video launching the ‘campaign’, he jokingly remarks:
Did you know that at age 12 you can have your ears pierced? You’re legally allowed to buy a spoon, but you’re not allowed to vote for your future. We think that’s wrong. We think that that’s a societal injustice on the level of women’s suffrage and working class suffrage. We need to deliver children’s suffrage.
The debate on votes at 16
Previously, Labour accused the Tories of blocking legislation that would allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in general elections, local elections, and referendums. Tory MPs spoke for so long that there was no time to vote on the issue. Labour MP for Oldham West and Royton Jim McMahon said:
I think the Government benches ought to be very concerned. Because 16- and 17-year-olds today might be denied the right to vote but in two years’ time, they will remember who blocked them from having that democratic right only two years earlier.
The de facto deputy prime minister David Lidington argued that 16- and 17-year-olds don’t have “sufficient maturity and responsibility” to deserve the right to vote.
Harwood backs this line of argument.
But in response to the stunt, YMCA spokesperson Liam Preston said:
Young people at 16 and 17 are mature enough to vote; they’re well educated enough to vote. They already engage in the types of issues that are debated at elections. And when they’re given the opportunity like in the Scottish Referendum, they will come out and register, and they will come out and vote.
In the US, we see 16-year-olds becoming very politically active following the recent school shooting in Florida.
Alienating young people
On Twitter at least, Harwood is not getting the positive response that he garnered for his anti-NUS campaign.
Way to completely alienate the youth vote.
— Melissa Deeply Unhelpful #FBPE #ExtremeEULoyalty (@MelisssfMelissa) February 23, 2018
Good one Tom, I'm sure treating young people with contempt will get them to vote Tory
— Aman ☃️🎄Tinsel🎄🎅 (@AmanTsays) February 23, 2018
Patronising and belittling young people is probably not a great strategy. They'll get to vote eventually and they'll remember who did this.
— Mick Walsh (@MickWalsh63) February 25, 2018
The Conservative Party has a hard time attracting young voters. As these Twitter users point out, the stunt will only serve to further alienate young people from the party. It’s doubtful whether you can attract young voters by mocking them and the issues they care about.
Get Involved!
– Join us, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.
Featured image via screengrab
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
