Tom Harwood is a Conservative commentator who became well known for his anti-NUS (National Union of Students) campaign. He’s now running a new satirical campaign called Votes At 12. Harwood’s stunt of fighting for the right of 12-year-olds to vote is his way of mocking the campaign for votes for 16-year-olds. But he doesn’t seem to be getting the response he wanted.
— Votes at 12 Campaign (@votesat12) February 22, 2018
Harwood on votes for 16-year-olds
A lot of the arguments about votes at 16 – in fact, almost all of them – can actually be applied to 12-year-olds. You might say that 12-year-olds aren’t allowed to buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, drive, fight for their country, marry without permission – all of these things – but that’s true of 16-year-olds as well.
In his video launching the ‘campaign’, he jokingly remarks:
Did you know that at age 12 you can have your ears pierced? You’re legally allowed to buy a spoon, but you’re not allowed to vote for your future. We think that’s wrong. We think that that’s a societal injustice on the level of women’s suffrage and working class suffrage. We need to deliver children’s suffrage.
The debate on votes at 16
Previously, Labour accused the Tories of blocking legislation that would allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in general elections, local elections, and referendums. Tory MPs spoke for so long that there was no time to vote on the issue. Labour MP for Oldham West and Royton Jim McMahon said:
I think the Government benches ought to be very concerned. Because 16- and 17-year-olds today might be denied the right to vote but in two years’ time, they will remember who blocked them from having that democratic right only two years earlier.
The de facto deputy prime minister David Lidington argued that 16- and 17-year-olds don’t have “sufficient maturity and responsibility” to deserve the right to vote.
Harwood backs this line of argument.
But in response to the stunt, YMCA spokesperson Liam Preston said:
Young people at 16 and 17 are mature enough to vote; they’re well educated enough to vote. They already engage in the types of issues that are debated at elections. And when they’re given the opportunity like in the Scottish Referendum, they will come out and register, and they will come out and vote.
Alienating young people
On Twitter at least, Harwood is not getting the positive response that he garnered for his anti-NUS campaign.
Way to completely alienate the youth vote.
— Melissa Deeply Unhelpful #FBPE #ExtremeEULoyalty (@MelisssfMelissa) February 23, 2018
Good one Tom, I'm sure treating young people with contempt will get them to vote Tory
— Aman ☃️🎄Tinsel🎄🎅 (@AmanTsays) February 23, 2018
Patronising and belittling young people is probably not a great strategy. They'll get to vote eventually and they'll remember who did this.
— Mick Walsh (@MickWalsh63) February 25, 2018
The Conservative Party has a hard time attracting young voters. As these Twitter users point out, the stunt will only serve to further alienate young people from the party. It’s doubtful whether you can attract young voters by mocking them and the issues they care about.
– Join us, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?