Nick Robinson recently launched a defence of the BBC‘s impartiality. But people on Twitter have poured scorn on Robinson’s claims.
The Today programme presenter and former political editor of the BBC wrote a piece in the New Statesman on 6 April. In it, he responded to accusations from Labour peer Andrew Adonis that the broadcaster exhibits a pro-Brexit bias.
Robinson argued that BBC rules make it clear “we have to deliver due impartiality”. He warned that those criticising the BBC should “be careful what you wish for”. Because he said that attacking the BBC could see the country ending up with “a British Fox News“:
‘Do not adjust your set. Normal service from the BBC means you will hear people you don’t agree with saying things you don’t like. That’s our job.’ My message to Remainers & Leavers who attack the BBC
See article in @NewStatesman https://t.co/jfi1e7diWB
— Nick Robinson (@bbcnickrobinson) April 6, 2018
But people on Twitter were quick to highlight Robinson’s Conservative Party roots:
Nick Robinson – President of Oxford University Conservative Association, President of Conservative Party Youth Group, founder member Macclesfield young Conservatives, Cheshire Young Conservatives Chairman, and Chairman of National Young Conservatives?
You think he’s BIASED?
— CyberEuro has left the building (@cybereuro) April 6, 2018
Some also mentioned the history of his colleagues:
BBC Chairman is Chris Patten, a former Conservative minister. The BBC's political editor, Nick Robinson, was once chairman of the Young Conservatives. Daily Politics Andrew Neil is chairman of the conservative Spectator magazine. You want more?
— Peter Montoya #GTTO (@senormontoya) April 6, 2018
But such Conservative connections to the BBC don’t have to be a problem, as long as the BBC offers “the best obtainable version of the truth”, which Robinson says it must. However, Robinson’s behaviour and that of other BBC figures suggest it’s not living up to that.
Take Robinson’s tweet in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal:
Big Brexit story this week is not Cambridge Analytica. It is Labour hardening up its position as @Keir_Starmer says “Article 50 was triggered a year ago. I don’t think there is any realistic prospect of it being revoked. Therefore we will be leaving the EU in March 2019.”
— Nick Robinson (@bbcnickrobinson) March 25, 2018
Social media users, however, disagreed:
Wrong. The Cambridge Analytica story is the UK's Watergate and you're trying to cover it up – that means you're colluding with the Government to deceive the public. Shame on you.
— Brexit is a fascist coup @FBPE @OFOC @ABTV (@ScrewBrexit) March 28, 2018
People have also previously highlighted the BBC‘s reporting of the poisoning of Sergei Skirpal as evidence that it’s not fulfilling its own remit:
BBC editing a Boris Johnson video from him lying to suddenly not lying is pretty extreme though, you've got to admit that's a tad dodgy.
— Fiona Worthington (@dustybay) April 6, 2018
And let’s not forget that BBC Newsnight recently emblazoned its studio with a Russian-style Jeremy Corbyn after he called for evidence to support claims that Russia was behind the Skirpal attack:
The BBC actually photoshopped Jeremy Corbyn's hat to make it look more Russian for this smear on Newsnight.
Let that sink in.
— John Clarke (@JohnClarke1960) March 16, 2018
All voices must be heard
When the BBC gives more air time to one side of a debate, it risks giving “false equivalence” to certain views. And on Brexit, some are concerned that particular voices are being heard all too often:
@mikegalsworthy Thing is Nick, it's not that we're hearing things we disagree with, it's that we're not hearing what more than half the country agrees with, namely that Brexit is bad for Britain, by our government's assessment.
There's no voice at the BBC calling for #FinalSay
— Jane #LookB4WeLeave #FinalSay (@localnotail) April 6, 2018
Nigel Farage, for example, who has never been elected as an MP, holds the record for appearances on Question Time:
BBC BIAS: 32nd Farage appearance on Question Time, BBC refusal to report anti-Brexit marches last Saturday, vetoing by BBC top execs of programmes criticising Brexit (of which more from me anon), & constant bias of Today Programme, convince me BBC now in breach of Charter
— Andrew Adonis (@Andrew_Adonis) March 30, 2018
Question Time is the BBC‘s flagship debate show. And the broadcaster has clearly given some Hard Brexit voices tons of air time on it.
A critical time
This is a critical time for the UK. Because the hard Brexit that many on the right are calling for is predicted to damage the UK economy. Others are offering alternatives though. Labour, for example, has argued for a treaty that would “do the work of the customs union”.
We need the BBC to deliver “the best obtainable version of the truth” now more than ever. It needs to hold the government to account and report fairly on Brexit and other issues.
A balanced debate which presents all the evidence is all people are asking for. That’s not too much to ask.
– You can make a complaint about the BBC’s coverage here.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets:
Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via BobBobb/Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?