The BBC is under fire again, this time for its coverage of the upcoming local elections. Because in a piece on its website with more than 1,500 words, it failed to mention the Green Party once. But it managed to cover UKIP and even the BNP.
Bias by omission?
As Left Foot Forward spotted, the BBC published an article on Sunday 8 April (updated on 9 April) about the local elections. It was a round-up of the major political parties, their chances of success, and where elections were happening. But the original piece failed to even mention the Green Party, which is fielding 2,200 candidates on 3 May.
Eagle-eyed social media users spotted the BBC‘s omission:
The BBC has a duty to be impartial. Yet time and again its election coverage is minimal for @TheGreenParty – or manages to bypass alltogether as in this piece where @BBCNews discusses C, L, LD, UKIP and even the BNP defending one seat, but not the Greens https://t.co/NGNprc1CF5
— James Abbott (@JamesAbbott2013) April 8, 2018
#BBC's English local election roundup with coverage of UKIP and BNP but no mention of Greens despite Greens submitting gigantic pool of candidates (around 2400 candidates I believe, half of max possible no of submissions). Pure, distilled #BBCBias https://t.co/Jij92bSLFn
— Colin Tosh (@crtosh1) April 8, 2018
BBC News bias against the Greens continues.
UKIP and even the sole BNP candidate mentioned, but NOT a single mention of the Greens.
— Neil Franks #CL4PM #FBPE (@NeilGreenMidWor) April 9, 2018
As Left Foot Forward noted, the BBC not mentioning the Green Party:
was even more apparent given that the article discussed UKIP – contesting around 500 seats – and even the BNP… in some depth.
Not that this is out of the ordinary.
A history of bias
In February, former UKIP leader Nigel Farage made a record-breaking 32nd appearance on BBC Question Time. Analysis by HuffPost UK showed that, since 2010, UKIP had someone on 24% of Question Time episodes, compared to the Greens’ 7%.
Meanwhile, back in 2014, the BBC received nearly 1,200 complaints that its coverage of the European and local elections that year was biased towards UKIP. In 2016, the BBC came under fire again for not showing any Green Party political broadcasts in the run-up to the EU referendum, but broadcasting UKIP’s.
Also, in last year’s local elections, the Green Party accused the BBC of breaching impartiality rules by giving “disproportionate” coverage to UKIP.
Back in the present day, and after Left Foot Forward‘s article, the BBC updated its own to include the following:
The Green Party says it is contesting 2,200 seats this time, more than half of the total. These include defending seats in Norwich and Solihull, where it is the official opposition party.
But this wasn’t good enough for some:
It has now been updated to add just one line about greens standing in 2200 seats. https://t.co/K334KObFjE
— London Green Party (@LonGreenParty) April 9, 2018
Should we trust BBC local elections coverage?
The BBC told Left Foot Forward:
We have covered The Green Party and its campaign launch for the English local elections… across our output.
The BBC is obliged to treat all political parties… with due impartiality.
Only this week, Ofcom said the BBC had breached accuracy guidelines on its Radio 4 Today programme. Couple that with repeated accusations over Newsnight‘s bias, a campaign to boycott it, and now this.
Our public service broadcaster used to be the envy of many countries. Now, it’s looking increasingly like a bad joke.
– You can make a complaint about the BBC’s coverage here.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.