Journalists are rounding on the BBC over its Vote Leave ‘election fraud’ coverage

The BBC logo
Support us and go ad-free

In the late evening on 3 July, the BBC broke this story:

Vote Leave broke electoral law, Electoral Commission expected to say

LBC host James O’Brien criticised the way the story was covered:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

And he wasn’t the only journalist to raise issue with the BBC‘s coverage.

The report

The draft report hasn’t been published by the Electoral Commission. But details of its contents were leaked to the press by Vote Leave. The Electoral Commission described the decision as “unusual”:

According to Vote Leave, the Electoral Commission is accusing it of four breaches of the law:

  • Breaking the £7m spending limit.
  • Inaccurately reporting its return on election expenditure.
  • Missing invoices and receipts.
  • Failing to comply with a statutory notice.

But Matthew Elliott, the former chief executive of Vote Leave, strongly denies the allegations. He has submitted a 500-page report to the Electoral Commission challenging the accusations.

Enter the BBC

But it’s the BBC‘s coverage of the leak that’s drawn criticism from journalists.

Channel 4‘s Krishnan Guru-Murthy asked:

Other journalists were also unimpressed:

Not just journalists

It wasn’t just journalists who had a problem with the BBC‘s coverage, though. Whistleblower Shahmir Sanni tweeted:

Another whistleblower, Christopher Wylie, also raised issues, suggesting the BBC had been manipulated:

Meanwhile, barrister Jo Maugham wrote:

‘Don’t believe the spin’

Award-winning journalist Carole Cadwalladr, who has doggedly pursued the story, argued that it’s important not to believe the spin:

Although Guru-Murthy suggested the BBC had a scoop that it was inevitably going to publish:

The BBC‘s live political programmes editor responded to the accusations:

And head of BBC Westminster insisted that the BBC is impartial:

But with so many leading journalists calling out the BBC‘s coverage, the broadcaster still has serious questions to answer.

Get Involved!

Support The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Flickr/Tim Loudon

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed