Journalists are rounding on the BBC over its Vote Leave ‘election fraud’ coverage

The BBC logo
Support us and go ad-free

In the late evening on 3 July, the BBC broke this story:

Vote Leave broke electoral law, Electoral Commission expected to say

LBC host James O’Brien criticised the way the story was covered:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

And he wasn’t the only journalist to raise issue with the BBC‘s coverage.

The report

The draft report hasn’t been published by the Electoral Commission. But details of its contents were leaked to the press by Vote Leave. The Electoral Commission described the decision as “unusual”:

According to Vote Leave, the Electoral Commission is accusing it of four breaches of the law:

  • Breaking the £7m spending limit.
  • Inaccurately reporting its return on election expenditure.
  • Missing invoices and receipts.
  • Failing to comply with a statutory notice.

But Matthew Elliott, the former chief executive of Vote Leave, strongly denies the allegations. He has submitted a 500-page report to the Electoral Commission challenging the accusations.

Enter the BBC

But it’s the BBC‘s coverage of the leak that’s drawn criticism from journalists.

Channel 4‘s Krishnan Guru-Murthy asked:

Other journalists were also unimpressed:

Not just journalists

It wasn’t just journalists who had a problem with the BBC‘s coverage, though. Whistleblower Shahmir Sanni tweeted:

Another whistleblower, Christopher Wylie, also raised issues, suggesting the BBC had been manipulated:

Meanwhile, barrister Jo Maugham wrote:

‘Don’t believe the spin’

Award-winning journalist Carole Cadwalladr, who has doggedly pursued the story, argued that it’s important not to believe the spin:

Although Guru-Murthy suggested the BBC had a scoop that it was inevitably going to publish:

The BBC‘s live political programmes editor responded to the accusations:

And head of BBC Westminster insisted that the BBC is impartial:

But with so many leading journalists calling out the BBC‘s coverage, the broadcaster still has serious questions to answer.

Get Involved!

Support The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Flickr/Tim Loudon

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed