Trump has a ‘solution’ for immigration. But his bullsh*t is lost on no one.

Donald Trump
Ed Sykes

On 10 July, US president Donald Trump offered a “solution” for recent scandals surrounding his country’s treatment of immigrant families. The problem with that “solution”, however, is that it calls on people to respect what the US government has long treated with utter contempt: laws and borders.

“We have laws. We have borders.”

The term “American exceptionalism” has a long history [paywall]. But many believe it summarises the idea that Washington feels it only has to abide by laws it finds convenient. As the Nation argues:

Washington, more than any other power, created the modern international community of laws and treaties, yet it now reserves the right to defy those same laws with impunity.

And as the America magazine says, “the U.S. violates international law in plain sight”.

In the 20th century, Washington used covert CIA operations to exert its influence abroad. That included supporting numerous coups and brutal right-wing dictatorships in its ‘backyard‘ in the 20th century. And today, in countries like ParaguayHonduras, Brazil, and (so far unsuccessfully) Venezuela, the same agenda is still playing out – albeit in slightly different ways.

The 21st century, meanwhile, has seen illegal US invasions of AfghanistanIraq, Libya, and the use of “endless incarceration, extrajudicial killing, pervasive surveillance, drone strikes in defiance of national boundaries, torture on demand, and immunity for all of the above on the grounds of state secrecy”.

Need more?

  1. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found in the 1980s that the US had violated international law in Nicaragua through its support for the anti-government ‘Contras’, and that it was guilty of attacking Nicaraguan shipping and oil installations, while mining the country’s ports and harbours. The US decided to withdraw from the ICJ’s compulsory jurisdiction rather than paying reparations.
  2. In 2013, the Washington Post reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) had “broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008”.
  3. Also in 2013, human rights groups said the US had broken international law by killing civilians in drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen.

Trump’s different, though, right?


In 2016, Alternet reported on Trump’s “lifetime of lawlessness” and “borderline criminality”. And it quoted award-winning investigative reporter David Cay Johnston, who wrote:

For his whole life Trump has cheated workersshortchanged small business owners and ripped off investors, as courts have determined in some of the 4,500 Trump lawsuits

Alternet went on to give ten specific examples from Johnston’s book – The Making of Donald Trump.

As president, meanwhile, Trump clearly dislikes established authorities looking into his own affairs in accordance with the law – calling legal investigations “a total witch hunt”.

Trump has faced allegations of breaking international law over his airstrikes in Syria. And experts have accused him of violating international norms by leaving the nuclear deal with Iran.

The real solution

In short, Trump’s “solution” flies in the face of decades of US disrespect for laws and borders – the consequences of which have been a key factor in encouraging immigration to the US.

Fortunately, the US Green Party’s Dr Jill Stein has offered a more effective solution:

And Stein’s right. If Trump is serious about ending immigration to the US, he must first put an end to his country’s disastrous foreign interventions. That will be a thousand times more effective than any wall he can build.

Get Involved!

– Join or support the Stop the War Coalition. Show your support for Veterans for Peace, who are fighting for peaceful solutions to the world’s problems. And take action with the Campaign Against Arms Trade.

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via screenshot

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed