Yet another museum is under fire for unethical corporate sponsorship

The outside of manchester museum of science and industry
Andrea Needham

Yet another museum is under fire for taking money from an unethical corporation. Only a week after the Design Museum got into trouble for taking dirty money, the Manchester Museum of Science and Industry has announced that it’s taking sponsorship from Shell.

In October, the museum will launch a new exhibition, Electricity: the spark of life. The six-month exhibition is part-sponsored by Shell UK.

Shell is one of the world’s biggest fossil fuel companies. It emerged recently that Shell knew during the 1980s that fossil fuel emissions were causing climate change. But concerned about the cost of taking action, the company chose to carry on with business as usual.

“Multiple things that piss me off”

Climate change campaigners were quick to condemn the museum:

 

Other institutions

Over the past few years, campaigners have targeted several other institutions for taking money from oil or arms companies. The National Gallery was condemned after taking money from Shell. The Natural History Museum and Science Museum were denounced for hosting arms fair receptions. And protests took place at the British Museum and the Royal Shakespeare Company after they took money from BP.

Additionally, earlier this month, 40 artists removed their work from the Design Museum in protest at the museum hosting an arms company reception.

Museum defends its decision

The Museum of Science and Industry must have anticipated some controversy. Director Sally Macdonald posted on the museum’s website to explain the decision. She said:

I know that some people disagree with our position that we should be open to seeking sponsorship from a wide range of corporate partners working in the fields of science, technology and engineering. However, it is a stance that both I and the Board of the Science Museum Group strongly support. These funding partners support our mission to inspire futures by igniting a curiosity in science. This is a goal that the museum and the Science Museum Group’s funders – as major employers of scientists and engineers – consider to be key.

It may be, however, that the museum’s decision is in conflict with its own ethics policy, which says:

There may be occasions when [Science Museum Group] will have to turn down opportunities of external funding…where SMG believes that acceptance could have a detrimental effect on its reputation.

Withdrawing in protest

The Design Museum didn’t come out well from a similar situation. And one company has already withdrawn from the museum’s upcoming Science Festival in protest at the deal with Shell:

If the museum is concerned about its reputation, taking sponsorship from Shell probably isn’t a great move. Next time, it might want to read this advice before accepting dirty money.

Get Involved!

Support Art Not Oil.

Tweet the museum to ask them to refuse sponsorship from Shell.

Read our other posts about climate change.

Featured image via Lmno/Wikimedia Commons

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed